Incidentaloma Discoveries in the Course of Neuroimaging Research.
Ethics
Legal issues
Neuroethics
Neuroimaging
Neurological practice
Neurology - Education
Neuropsychiatry
Neurovascular
Psychiatry
fMRI
Journal
The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques
ISSN: 0317-1671
Titre abrégé: Can J Neurol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0415227
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
2
4
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
2
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
ABSTRACTAmong healthy volunteers in psychiatric brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research studies, the prevalence of incidentalomas can be as high as 34%, of which 10% show clinical significance. An incidentaloma is a lesion found by coincidence without clinical symptoms or suspicion. Like lesions and other types of accidental findings, it is found in healthy individuals recruited to take part in psychiatric studies. The prevalence of these accidental findings among specific psychiatric populations remains unknown. However, a precise understanding of cerebral neuroanatomy, neuroradiological expertise, and an appropriate choice of fMRI exploration sequences will increase the sensitivity of identifying these accidental findings and enable researchers to address their clinical relevance and nature. We present recommendations on how to appropriately inform patients or participants of the accidental findings. Additionally, we propose specific suggestions pertaining to the clinical research setting aimed for investigators and psychiatrists. Unlike current articles pertaining to incidentaloma, the current report provides a distinct focus on psychiatric issues and specific recommendations for studies involving psychiatric patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30932801
pii: S0317167118003979
doi: 10.1017/cjn.2018.397
pmc: PMC6536828
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
275-279Références
Neurology. 2011 Dec 13;77(24):2123-7
pubmed: 22131543
JAMA. 1999 Jul 7;282(1):36-9
pubmed: 10404909
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2005 Sep;161(8-9):862-7
pubmed: 16244573
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jul;207(1):W1-2
pubmed: 27144947
Am Fam Physician. 2014 Dec 1;90(11):758-9
pubmed: 25611709
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jun;202(6):W602
pubmed: 24848860
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):286-91, 212
pubmed: 18547196
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):361-83, 214
pubmed: 18547206
J Neuroradiol. 2003 Dec;30(5):336-50
pubmed: 14752379
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov;201(5):1064-8
pubmed: 23902536
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Jun;89(6):718-21
pubmed: 24943691
Br J Radiol. 2010 Apr;83(988):276-89
pubmed: 20335439
JAMA. 2014 Feb 12;311(6):562-3
pubmed: 24519282
J Neurol Sci. 2006 Jan 15;240(1-2):81-4
pubmed: 16256141
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):315-9, 213
pubmed: 18547200
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Sep 15;180(6):562-4
pubmed: 25150271
Radiology. 2016 Nov;281(2):507-515
pubmed: 27337027
Radiology. 1997 Jan;202(1):41-6
pubmed: 8988190
Neurology. 2004 Mar 23;62(6):888-90
pubmed: 15037687
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 1;55(3):1020-3
pubmed: 21224007
CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):655-6
pubmed: 24688013
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 27;170(17):1525-32
pubmed: 20876402
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 1;357(18):1821-8
pubmed: 17978290
J Med Ethics. 2009 Mar;35(3):194-9
pubmed: 19251973