The oval technique for nipple-areolar complex reconstruction.

Areola Breast Mammaplasty Nipple

Journal

Archives of plastic surgery
ISSN: 2234-6163
Titre abrégé: Arch Plast Surg
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101577999

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 20 02 2018
accepted: 12 09 2018
entrez: 2 4 2019
pubmed: 2 4 2019
medline: 2 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction is the final stage of breast reconstruction. Ideal reconstruction of the NAC requires symmetry in position, size, shape, texture, pigmentation, and permanent projection, and although many technical descriptions of NAC reconstruction exist in the medical literature, there is no gold standard technique. The technique devised by the authors is very versatile, with excellent. , and it enables 1-step reconstruction with optimal results in terms of shape and nipple projection. Our technique consists of a combination of modified local flaps and a full-thickness skin graft. Patients were observed for 18 months to estimate the amount of retraction. This procedure was performed in 40 patients, four of them bilaterally. The duration of the follow- up was 30 months. Complications occurred in 10% of patients, and included infections (5%), ischemia (2.5%), and hematoma (2.5%). No cases of total nipple necrosis were reported. The NAC shape remained optimal in all cases, with a very small reduction of the vertical and horizontal diameters of the areola, which maintained its designed round shape well, and negligible retraction in the diameter and projection of the nipple. The oval technique represents a major step forward, involving a combination of existing techniques, such as the C-V flap and the cutaneous graft, to achieve excellent results regarding areola shape and nipple projection, significantly reducing the cases of nipple ischemia. These results were substantially obtained through subcutaneous equatorial sutures, skin grafting, and flattening of the apexes of the flap.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction is the final stage of breast reconstruction. Ideal reconstruction of the NAC requires symmetry in position, size, shape, texture, pigmentation, and permanent projection, and although many technical descriptions of NAC reconstruction exist in the medical literature, there is no gold standard technique. The technique devised by the authors is very versatile, with excellent.
RESULTS RESULTS
, and it enables 1-step reconstruction with optimal results in terms of shape and nipple projection.
METHODS METHODS
Our technique consists of a combination of modified local flaps and a full-thickness skin graft. Patients were observed for 18 months to estimate the amount of retraction. This procedure was performed in 40 patients, four of them bilaterally. The duration of the follow- up was 30 months. Complications occurred in 10% of patients, and included infections (5%), ischemia (2.5%), and hematoma (2.5%).
RESULTS RESULTS
No cases of total nipple necrosis were reported. The NAC shape remained optimal in all cases, with a very small reduction of the vertical and horizontal diameters of the areola, which maintained its designed round shape well, and negligible retraction in the diameter and projection of the nipple.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The oval technique represents a major step forward, involving a combination of existing techniques, such as the C-V flap and the cutaneous graft, to achieve excellent results regarding areola shape and nipple projection, significantly reducing the cases of nipple ischemia. These results were substantially obtained through subcutaneous equatorial sutures, skin grafting, and flattening of the apexes of the flap.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30934176
pii: aps.2018.00164
doi: 10.5999/aps.2018.00164
pmc: PMC6446026
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

129-134

Références

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Oct;104(5):1321-4
pubmed: 10513912
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Sep;106(4):769-76
pubmed: 11007387
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Oct;106(5):1014-25; discussion 1026-7
pubmed: 11039373
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Sep 1;110(3):780-6
pubmed: 12172139
Br J Plast Surg. 2003 Apr;56(3):247-51
pubmed: 12859920
Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1949 May;4(3):295-8
pubmed: 18131359
Dan Med J. 2013 Oct;60(10):A4674
pubmed: 24083522
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Aug 25;3(8):e490
pubmed: 26495203
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;42(4):441-65
pubmed: 26868167
Br J Plast Surg. 1977 Jul;30(3):220-2
pubmed: 329932
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977 Sep;60(3):353-61
pubmed: 331365
Clin Plast Surg. 1979 Jan;6(1):71-83
pubmed: 376215
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972 Oct;50(4):350-3
pubmed: 4561575
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983 Jan;71(1):126-33
pubmed: 6336842
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981 Aug;68(2):245-8
pubmed: 7255587
Ann Plast Surg. 1993 Jan;30(1):23-6
pubmed: 8333683
Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Jul;50(5):331-4
pubmed: 9245866

Auteurs

Amalia Vozza (A)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Fabio Larocca (F)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Giuseppe Ferraro (G)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Giovanni Francesco Nicoletti (GF)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Francesco D'Andrea (F)

Unit of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Classifications MeSH