Fully closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a two-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.


Journal

The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology
ISSN: 2213-8595
Titre abrégé: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101618821

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2019
Historique:
received: 16 12 2018
revised: 07 02 2019
accepted: 12 02 2019
pubmed: 3 4 2019
medline: 26 5 2020
entrez: 3 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Glucose management is challenging in patients who require nutritional support in hospital. We aimed to assess whether fully closed-loop insulin delivery would improve glycaemic control compared with conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy in inpatients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition or both. We did a two-centre (UK and Switzerland), open-label, randomised controlled trial in adult inpatients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition (or both) who required subcutaneous insulin therapy. Patients recruited from non-critical care surgical and medical wards were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated minimisation schedule (stratified by type of nutritional support [parenteral nutrition on or off] and pre-study total daily insulin dose [<50 or ≥50 units]) to receive fully closed-loop insulin delivery with faster-acting insulin aspart (closed-loop group) or conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy (control group) given in accordance with local clinical practice. Continuous glucose monitoring in the control group was masked to patients, ward staff, and investigators. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 15 days or until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was the proportion of time that sensor glucose concentration was in target range (5·6-10·0 mmol/L), assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01774565. Between Feb 8, 2018, and Sept 21, 2018, 90 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 43 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the closed-loop group (n=21) or the control group (n=22). The proportion of time that sensor glucose was in the target range was 68·4% [SD 15·5] in the closed-loop group and 36·4% [26·6] in the control group (difference 32·0 percentage points [95% CI 18·5-45·5; p<0·0001]). One serious adverse event occurred in each group (one cardiac arrest in the control group and one episode of acute respiratory failure in the closed-loop group), both of which were unrelated to study interventions. There were no adverse events related to study interventions in either group. No episodes of severe hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia with ketonaemia occurred in either study group. Closed-loop insulin delivery is an effective treatment option to improve glycaemic control in patients receiving nutritional support in hospital. Diabetes UK, Swiss National Science Foundation, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, and European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Glucose management is challenging in patients who require nutritional support in hospital. We aimed to assess whether fully closed-loop insulin delivery would improve glycaemic control compared with conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy in inpatients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition or both.
METHODS
We did a two-centre (UK and Switzerland), open-label, randomised controlled trial in adult inpatients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition (or both) who required subcutaneous insulin therapy. Patients recruited from non-critical care surgical and medical wards were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated minimisation schedule (stratified by type of nutritional support [parenteral nutrition on or off] and pre-study total daily insulin dose [<50 or ≥50 units]) to receive fully closed-loop insulin delivery with faster-acting insulin aspart (closed-loop group) or conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy (control group) given in accordance with local clinical practice. Continuous glucose monitoring in the control group was masked to patients, ward staff, and investigators. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 15 days or until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was the proportion of time that sensor glucose concentration was in target range (5·6-10·0 mmol/L), assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01774565.
FINDINGS
Between Feb 8, 2018, and Sept 21, 2018, 90 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 43 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the closed-loop group (n=21) or the control group (n=22). The proportion of time that sensor glucose was in the target range was 68·4% [SD 15·5] in the closed-loop group and 36·4% [26·6] in the control group (difference 32·0 percentage points [95% CI 18·5-45·5; p<0·0001]). One serious adverse event occurred in each group (one cardiac arrest in the control group and one episode of acute respiratory failure in the closed-loop group), both of which were unrelated to study interventions. There were no adverse events related to study interventions in either group. No episodes of severe hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia with ketonaemia occurred in either study group.
INTERPRETATION
Closed-loop insulin delivery is an effective treatment option to improve glycaemic control in patients receiving nutritional support in hospital.
FUNDING
Diabetes UK, Swiss National Science Foundation, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, and European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30935872
pii: S2213-8587(19)30061-0
doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30061-0
pmc: PMC6467839
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Blood Glucose 0
Insulin 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01774565']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

368-377

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4·0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

J Clin Nurs. 2001 Jul;10(4):482-90
pubmed: 11822496
Clin Nutr. 2003 Jun;22(3):235-9
pubmed: 12765661
Diabetes Care. 2005 Oct;28(10):2367-71
pubmed: 16186264
Am J Crit Care. 2006 Jul;15(4):370-7
pubmed: 16823014
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1283-97
pubmed: 19318384
Nutr Clin Pract. 2009 Oct-Nov;24(5):626-34
pubmed: 19564627
Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):739-41
pubmed: 20040658
Endocr Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):853-61
pubmed: 21550947
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):49-58
pubmed: 22090269
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):16-38
pubmed: 22223765
Diabet Med. 2012 Dec;29(12):e445-8
pubmed: 22937877
Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1061-6
pubmed: 23223407
Nutrition. 2013 Mar;29(3):497-501
pubmed: 23398919
Crit Care. 2013 Jul 24;17(4):R159
pubmed: 23883613
Endocr Pract. 2014 Jan;20(1):41-5
pubmed: 24013986
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Feb;5(2):117-124
pubmed: 27836235
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017 Jul;33(5):
pubmed: 28067472
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018 Jul;42(5):846-854
pubmed: 28792863
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 12;8(1):5888
pubmed: 29651052
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 09;379(6):547-556
pubmed: 29940126

Auteurs

Charlotte K Boughton (CK)

Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Lia Bally (L)

Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Franco Martignoni (F)

Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Sara Hartnell (S)

Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

David Herzig (D)

Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Andreas Vogt (A)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Maria M Wertli (MM)

Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Malgorzata E Wilinska (ME)

Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Mark L Evans (ML)

Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Anthony P Coll (AP)

Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Christoph Stettler (C)

Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Roman Hovorka (R)

Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: rh347@cam.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH