A vertical load applied towards the trunk unilaterally increases the bilateral abdominal muscle activities.

EMG Trunk function Trunk muscles

Journal

Journal of physical therapy science
ISSN: 0915-5287
Titre abrégé: J Phys Ther Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9105359

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 31 10 2018
accepted: 19 12 2018
entrez: 3 4 2019
pubmed: 3 4 2019
medline: 3 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

[Purpose] It is considered that evaluation of the vertical trunk function is important, because humans stand and move with two legs. To evaluate this, a novel method named Trunk Righting Test has been reported. The purpose of this study was to examine the trunk muscle activity during a TRT using electromyogram analysis. [Participants and Methods] This study included 7 healthy volunteer males. The TRT evaluated the supportability of the posture after moving 10 cm laterally from the sitting position using a hand-held dynamometer. The TRT measurements were analyzed separately at the measurement side (ipsilateral side) and at the non-measurement side (contralateral side). The measurements were obtained bilaterally, and the evaluated muscles included the rectus abdominis, internal oblique, external oblique, multifidus, and transversus abdominis. The measured value was expressed as a percentage after comparing with the value at the maximum voluntary contraction (% MVC) for standardization. The changes in the muscle activities in the sitting position and TRT were evaluated. [Results] All the muscle activities significantly increased during the TRT in contrast to that in the sitting posture. [Conclusion] The load support of the trunk on one side during the TRT was significant in all the muscles on both the sides, which increased the muscle activity, in contrast to that in the sitting position.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30936644
doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.273
pii: jpts-2018-388
pmc: PMC6428654
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

273-276

Références

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 Mar;14(3):203-16
pubmed: 10619108
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003 Oct;13(5):477-89
pubmed: 12932422
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Feb;86(2):242-9
pubmed: 15706550
Man Ther. 2007 Aug;12(3):271-9
pubmed: 16971159
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 May;37(5):223-31
pubmed: 17549950
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Oct;19(5):754-62
pubmed: 18160311
N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Aug;1(3):132-9
pubmed: 21522225
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 May;27(5):1633-6
pubmed: 26157279
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;230:1-54
pubmed: 2658468
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):996-1000
pubmed: 28626308
Am J Phys Med. 1967 Feb;46(1):900-61
pubmed: 6023297
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Nov 15;21(22):2640-50
pubmed: 8961451
Phys Ther. 1997 Feb;77(2):132-42; discussion 142-4
pubmed: 9037214
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998 Aug;8(4):205-14
pubmed: 9779394

Auteurs

Kazuaki Kinoshita (K)

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Shijonawate Gakuen University: 5-11-10 Hojo, Daito, Osaka 574-0011, Japan.

Kazunari Ishida (K)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe Kaisei Hospital, Japan.

Masashi Hashimoto (M)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, Osaka Kawasaki Rehabilitation University, Japan.

Hidetoshi Nakao (H)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, Osaka Kawasaki Rehabilitation University, Japan.

Nao Shibanuma (N)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe Kaisei Hospital, Japan.

Masahiro Kurosaka (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe Kaisei Hospital, Japan.

Shingo Otsuki (S)

Department of Sport and Health Science, Osaka Sangyo University, Japan.

Classifications MeSH