Infection kinetics and antibody responses in Deccani sheep during experimental infection and superinfection with bluetongue virus serotypes 4 and 16.
bluetongue
bluetongue virus-16
bluetongue virus-4
infection kinetics
superinfection
Journal
Veterinary world
ISSN: 0972-8988
Titre abrégé: Vet World
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101504872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
11
09
2018
accepted:
14
11
2018
entrez:
3
4
2019
pubmed:
3
4
2019
medline:
3
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The current study was designed to understand the infection kinetics and antibody responses of major circulating serotypes of bluetongue virus (BTV) in India, i.e., BTV-4 and BTV-16 through experimental infection and superinfection of Deccani sheep, a popular breed of sheep found in the southern states of India. Experimental infection with 10 Certain interesting findings have been made in the course of experimental infection, such as prominent signs of infection in BTV-4 infection, mild or no clinical signs in BTV-16-infected and superinfected animals, and non-seroconversion of one of the BTV-16-superinfected animals. In addition, BTV was isolated from infected sheep in all the experimental conditions except BTV-16 superinfection. Furthermore, it was observed that immune response in the form of type-specific antibodies was slower with BTV-16 superinfection. Superinfection of a sheep with more than one serotype of BTV is a common phenomenon in BT endemic countries like India. Such situation was replicated in an experimental infection in the current study, and the findings to our knowledge are first of a kind and are likely to aid in unfolding the newer aspects of BTV pathogenesis and virulence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30936652
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.41-47
pii: Vetworld-12-41
pmc: PMC6431802
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
41-47Références
J Gen Virol. 2001 Apr;82(Pt 4):787-94
pubmed: 11257183
Virology. 2002 May 10;296(2):330-7
pubmed: 12069531
Vet Microbiol. 2002 Aug 25;88(2):115-25
pubmed: 12135632
J Virol Methods. 2006 Oct;137(1):34-42
pubmed: 16876884
J Gen Virol. 2007 Feb;88(Pt 2):621-30
pubmed: 17251581
Vet Rec. 2007 Aug 25;161(8):253-61
pubmed: 17720961
Vet Pathol. 2008 May;45(3):310-5
pubmed: 18487487
J Comp Pathol. 2009 Jul;141(1):1-16
pubmed: 19476953
Vet Ital. 2004 Oct-Dec;40(4):462-7
pubmed: 20422570
Vet Ital. 2004 Oct-Dec;40(4):616-22
pubmed: 20422597
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2011 Jun 15;141(3-4):230-8
pubmed: 21511346
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1990;162:119-41
pubmed: 2166643
Vet Microbiol. 2012 May 25;157(1-2):119-24
pubmed: 22177889
J Virol. 2013 Jan;87(1):543-57
pubmed: 23097432
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2012 Aug 03;83(1):17
pubmed: 23327131
Antiviral Res. 2013 Aug;99(2):79-90
pubmed: 23664958
Virus Res. 2014 Mar;182:21-34
pubmed: 24462840
J Virol. 2014 Sep;88(18):10399-411
pubmed: 24991012
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2014 Oct 16;85(1):1041
pubmed: 25686101
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016 Aug;63(4):360-4
pubmed: 27241307
J Gen Virol. 2016 Sep;97(9):2073-83
pubmed: 27435041
Vet Res. 2016 Jul 28;47(1):73
pubmed: 27465686
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 23;11(9):e0163014
pubmed: 27661614
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Dec;64(6):1912-1917
pubmed: 28004522
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Apr;65(2):e243-e250
pubmed: 29119690
Vet World. 2018 Apr;11(4):452-458
pubmed: 29805209