Exploring the Experiences of Individuals Allocated to a Control Setting: Findings From a Mobile Health Smoking Cessation Trial.
cell phone
control groups
mobile phones
smoking cessation
students
text messaging
tobacco smoking
Journal
JMIR human factors
ISSN: 2292-9495
Titre abrégé: JMIR Hum Factors
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666561
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Apr 2019
02 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
07
09
2018
accepted:
29
12
2018
revised:
05
12
2018
entrez:
3
4
2019
pubmed:
3
4
2019
medline:
3
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tobacco smoking is the primary cause of preventable premature disease and death worldwide. Evidence of the efficacy of text messaging interventions to reduce smoking behavior is well established, but there is still a need for studies targeting young people, especially because young adult smokers are less likely to seek treatment than older adults. A mobile health intervention, Nicotine Exit (NEXit), targeting smoking among university students was developed to support university students to quit smoking. Short-term effectiveness was measured through a randomized controlled trial, which found that immediately after the 12-week intervention, 26% of smokers in the intervention group had prolonged abstinence compared with 15% in the control group. The objective of this study was to explore the experience of being allocated to the control group in the NEXit smoking cessation intervention. We asked students who were allocated to the control group in the main NEXit randomized controlled trial to report their experiences. An email was sent to the participants with an electronic link to a short questionnaire. We assessed the distribution of the responses to the questionnaire by descriptive analysis. We analyzed free-text comments to 4 questions. The response rate for the questionnaire was 33.8% (258/763), and we collected 143 free-text comments. Of the responders, 60.9% (157/258) experienced frustration, disappointment, and irritation about being allocated to the control group; they felt they were being denied support by having to wait for the intervention. Monthly text messages during the waiting period thanking them for taking part in the trial were perceived as negative by 72.3% (189/258), but for some the messages served as a reminder about the decision to quit smoking. Of the responders, 61.2% (158/258) chose to wait to quit smoking until they had access to the intervention, and 29.8% (77/258) decided to try to quit smoking without support. Of the respondents, 77.5% (200/258) claimed they were still smoking and had signed up or were thinking about signing up for the smoking cessation program at the time of the questionnaire. Most of the respondents reported negative feelings about having to wait for the support of the intervention and that they had decided to continue smoking. A similar number decided to wait to quit smoking until they had access to the intervention, and these respondents reported a high interest in the intervention. Free-text comments indicated that some control group participants believed that they had been excluded from the trial, while others were confused when asked to sign up for the intervention again. ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN75766527; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN75766527 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/7678sUKbR).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Tobacco smoking is the primary cause of preventable premature disease and death worldwide. Evidence of the efficacy of text messaging interventions to reduce smoking behavior is well established, but there is still a need for studies targeting young people, especially because young adult smokers are less likely to seek treatment than older adults. A mobile health intervention, Nicotine Exit (NEXit), targeting smoking among university students was developed to support university students to quit smoking. Short-term effectiveness was measured through a randomized controlled trial, which found that immediately after the 12-week intervention, 26% of smokers in the intervention group had prolonged abstinence compared with 15% in the control group.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to explore the experience of being allocated to the control group in the NEXit smoking cessation intervention.
METHODS
METHODS
We asked students who were allocated to the control group in the main NEXit randomized controlled trial to report their experiences. An email was sent to the participants with an electronic link to a short questionnaire. We assessed the distribution of the responses to the questionnaire by descriptive analysis. We analyzed free-text comments to 4 questions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The response rate for the questionnaire was 33.8% (258/763), and we collected 143 free-text comments. Of the responders, 60.9% (157/258) experienced frustration, disappointment, and irritation about being allocated to the control group; they felt they were being denied support by having to wait for the intervention. Monthly text messages during the waiting period thanking them for taking part in the trial were perceived as negative by 72.3% (189/258), but for some the messages served as a reminder about the decision to quit smoking. Of the responders, 61.2% (158/258) chose to wait to quit smoking until they had access to the intervention, and 29.8% (77/258) decided to try to quit smoking without support. Of the respondents, 77.5% (200/258) claimed they were still smoking and had signed up or were thinking about signing up for the smoking cessation program at the time of the questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Most of the respondents reported negative feelings about having to wait for the support of the intervention and that they had decided to continue smoking. A similar number decided to wait to quit smoking until they had access to the intervention, and these respondents reported a high interest in the intervention. Free-text comments indicated that some control group participants believed that they had been excluded from the trial, while others were confused when asked to sign up for the intervention again.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN75766527; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN75766527 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/7678sUKbR).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30938682
pii: v6i2e12139
doi: 10.2196/12139
pmc: PMC6465977
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e12139Informations de copyright
©Ulrika Müssener, Catharina Linderoth, Marcus Bendtsen. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (http://humanfactors.jmir.org), 02.04.2019.
Références
Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Feb;5(1):13-25
pubmed: 12745503
JAMA. 2004 Oct 6;292(13):1593-601
pubmed: 15467062
J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):727-32
pubmed: 16319239
J Law Med. 2006 May;13(4):496-504
pubmed: 16756218
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 6;146(3):167-76
pubmed: 17283347
QJM. 2008 Aug;101(8):625-9
pubmed: 18487271
J Pain Res. 2010 Aug 26;3:155-60
pubmed: 21197319
Addict Behav. 2011 Apr;36(4):315-9
pubmed: 21215528
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD006611
pubmed: 23152238
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Aug;15(8):1388-99
pubmed: 23348969
PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001363
pubmed: 23458994
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 23;(8):CD003289
pubmed: 23975659
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):243-7
pubmed: 24492159
Prev Sci. 2015 Feb;16(2):181-8
pubmed: 24930386
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Sep;56:1-10
pubmed: 25720333
Trials. 2015 Apr 08;16:140
pubmed: 25872503
Addiction. 2015 Oct;110(10):1586-94
pubmed: 25988589
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):321-8
pubmed: 26903176
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):1179
pubmed: 27876031
Prev Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5 Pt 3):A3-8
pubmed: 9808812