Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography With Subsequent Change in Clinical Management Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Amyloid
Cognitive Dysfunction
/ diagnostic imaging
Dementia
/ diagnostic imaging
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Medicare
Nootropic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Plaque, Amyloid
/ diagnostic imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography
United States
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 04 2019
02 04 2019
Historique:
entrez:
3
4
2019
pubmed:
3
4
2019
medline:
23
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) detects amyloid plaques in the brain, a core neuropathological feature of Alzheimer disease. To determine if amyloid PET is associated with subsequent changes in the management of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia of uncertain etiology. The Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) study was a single-group, multisite longitudinal study that assessed the association between amyloid PET and subsequent changes in clinical management for Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia. Participants were required to meet published appropriate use criteria stating that etiology of cognitive impairment was unknown, Alzheimer disease was a diagnostic consideration, and knowledge of PET results was expected to change diagnosis and management. A total of 946 dementia specialists at 595 US sites enrolled 16 008 patients between February 2016 and September 2017. Patients were followed up through January 2018. Dementia specialists documented their diagnosis and management plan before PET and again 90 (±30) days after PET. Participants underwent amyloid PET at 343 imaging centers. The primary end point was change in management between the pre- and post-PET visits, as assessed by a composite outcome that included Alzheimer disease drug therapy, other drug therapy, and counseling about safety and future planning. The study was powered to detect a 30% or greater change in the MCI and dementia groups. One of 2 secondary end points is reported: the proportion of changes in diagnosis (from Alzheimer disease to non-Alzheimer disease and vice versa) between pre- and post-PET visits. Among 16 008 registered participants, 11 409 (71.3%) completed study procedures and were included in the analysis (median age, 75 years [interquartile range, 71-80]; 50.9% women; 60.5% with MCI). Amyloid PET results were positive in 3817 patients with MCI (55.3%) and 3154 patients with dementia (70.1%). The composite end point changed in 4159 of 6905 patients with MCI (60.2% [95% CI, 59.1%-61.4%]) and 2859 of 4504 patients with dementia (63.5% [95% CI, 62.1%-64.9%]), significantly exceeding the 30% threshold in each group (P < .001, 1-sided). The etiologic diagnosis changed from Alzheimer disease to non-Alzheimer disease in 2860 of 11 409 patients (25.1% [95% CI, 24.3%-25.9%]) and from non-Alzheimer disease to Alzheimer disease in 1201 of 11 409 (10.5% [95% CI, 10.0%-11.1%]). Among Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia of uncertain etiology evaluated by dementia specialists, the use of amyloid PET was associated with changes in clinical management within 90 days. Further research is needed to determine whether amyloid PET is associated with improved clinical outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02420756.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30938796
pii: 2729371
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2000
pmc: PMC6450276
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid
0
Nootropic Agents
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02420756']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1286-1294Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG010129
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):306-19
pubmed: 14991808
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 9;352(23):2379-88
pubmed: 15829527
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;15(1):84-7
pubmed: 17194818
J Nucl Med. 2007 Nov;48(11):1901-8
pubmed: 17942807
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2011 Nov 10;3(6):31
pubmed: 22071129
Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Jan;8(1):1-13
pubmed: 22265587
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012 Mar;2(3):a006395
pubmed: 22393531
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012 Apr;71(4):266-73
pubmed: 22437338
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Aug;11(8):669-78
pubmed: 22749065
Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Sep;8(5):445-52
pubmed: 22959699
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013 Jan-Mar;27(1):4-15
pubmed: 23203162
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):149-56
pubmed: 23290598
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jan;9(1):e-1-16
pubmed: 23360977
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2013 Apr;19(2 Dementia):339-57
pubmed: 23558481
J Nucl Med. 2013 Jul;54(7):1011-3
pubmed: 23753186
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;86(2):135-43
pubmed: 24828899
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Mar;72(3):287-94
pubmed: 25622185
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Aug;11(8):964-74
pubmed: 25824567
JAMA. 2015 May 19;313(19):1924-38
pubmed: 25988462
JAMA. 2015 May 19;313(19):1939-49
pubmed: 25988463
Brain. 2016 Jan;139(Pt 1):23-30
pubmed: 26614753
Neurology. 2016 Apr 12;86(15):1377-1385
pubmed: 26968515
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Oct 03;1(4):412-9
pubmed: 27239522
J Nucl Med. 2016 Aug;57(8):1316-22
pubmed: 27481605
Nature. 2016 Aug 31;537(7618):50-6
pubmed: 27582220
Neurology. 2018 Jan 16;90(3):126-135
pubmed: 29282327
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(suppl_1):S48-S57
pubmed: 29361066
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(2):783-796
pubmed: 29689725
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):1114-1123
pubmed: 29799984
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(1):323-335
pubmed: 29889075
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):1062-1070
pubmed: 29889941
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018 Nov 03;10:773-781
pubmed: 30505927