Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for aggressive pituitary tumors: a monocentric experience.

PRRT aggressive pituitary adenomas peptide receptor radionuclide therapy pituitary tumors

Journal

Endocrine connections
ISSN: 2049-3614
Titre abrégé: Endocr Connect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101598413

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 May 2019
Historique:
received: 16 03 2019
accepted: 01 04 2019
pubmed: 3 4 2019
medline: 3 4 2019
entrez: 3 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In aggressive pituitary tumors (PT) showing local invasion or growth/recurrence despite multimodal conventional treatment, temozolomide (TMZ) is considered a further therapeutic option, while little data are available on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). We analyzed PRRT effectiveness, safety and long-term outcome in three patients with aggressive PT, also reviewing the current literature. Patient #1 (F, giant prolactinoma) received five cycles (total dose 37 GBq) of 111In-DTPA-octreotide over 23 months, after unsuccessful surgery and long-term dopamine-agonist treatment. Patient #2 (M, giant prolactinoma) underwent two cycles (12.6 GBq) of 177Lu-DOTATOC after multiple surgeries, radiosurgery and TMZ. In patient #3 (F, non-functioning PT), five cycles (29.8 GBq) of 177Lu-DOTATOC followed five surgeries, radiotherapy and TMZ. Eleven more cases of PRRT-treated aggressive PT emerged from literature. Patient #1 showed tumor shrinkage and visual/neurological amelioration over 8-year follow-up, while the other PTs continued to grow causing blindness and neuro-cognitive disorders (patient #2) or monolateral amaurosis (patient #3). No adverse effects were reported. Including the patients from literature, 4/13 presented tumor shrinkage and clinical/biochemical improvement after PRRT. Response did not correlate with patients' gender or age, neither with used radionuclide/peptide, but PRRT failure was significantly associated with previous TMZ treatment. Overall, adverse effects occurred only in two patients. PRRT was successful in 1/3 of patients with aggressive PT, and in 4/5 of those not previously treated with TMZ, representing a safe option after unsuccessful multimodal treatment. However, at present, considering the few data, PRRT should be considered only in an experimental setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30939449
doi: 10.1530/EC-19-0065
pii: EC-19-0065
pmc: PMC6499924
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

528-535

Références

ScientificWorldJournal. 2010 Nov 04;10:2132-8
pubmed: 21057727
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 1;26(13):2124-30
pubmed: 18445841
J Neurooncol. 2016 Feb;126(3):519-25
pubmed: 26614517
Cancer Res. 1998 Feb 1;58(3):437-41
pubmed: 9458086
Eur J Endocrinol. 2017 Jun;176(6):769-777
pubmed: 28432119
Endocr Rev. 2011 Apr;32(2):247-71
pubmed: 21123741
Eur J Clin Invest. 2013 Jan;43(1):20-6
pubmed: 23134557
Front Horm Res. 2015;44:198-215
pubmed: 26303714
Pituitary. 2014 Jun;17(3):227-31
pubmed: 23740146
Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Oct;134(4):521-535
pubmed: 28821944
Pituitary. 2012 Dec;15 Suppl 1:S57-60
pubmed: 22222543
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Nov;101(11):3888-3921
pubmed: 27736313
J Nucl Med. 2000 Oct;41(10):1704-13
pubmed: 11038002
J Neurosurg. 2016 Aug;125(2):346-9
pubmed: 26636388
Pituitary. 2008;11(1):93-102
pubmed: 17458701
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995 Apr;80(4):1386-92
pubmed: 7714115
Int J Cancer. 2001 Jun 1;92(5):628-33
pubmed: 11340564
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 20;23(12):2754-62
pubmed: 15837990
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jun;60(6):993-1002; discussion 1003-4
pubmed: 17538372
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 May;40(5):800-16
pubmed: 23389427
Neuroendocrinology. 2015;101(2):87-104
pubmed: 25571935
Pituitary. 2014 Dec;17(6):530-8
pubmed: 24323313
J Mol Endocrinol. 2014 Jun;52(3):R223-40
pubmed: 24647046
Eur J Endocrinol. 2018 Jan;178(1):G1-G24
pubmed: 29046323
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Apr;100(4):1689-98
pubmed: 25646794
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;97:140-155
pubmed: 27713064
Pituitary. 2018 Apr;21(2):168-175
pubmed: 29344905

Auteurs

G Giuffrida (G)

Endocrine Unit of University Hospital 'AOU Policlinico G. Martino', Messina, Italy.
PhD School of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.

F Ferraù (F)

Endocrine Unit of University Hospital 'AOU Policlinico G. Martino', Messina, Italy.
Department of Human Pathology 'G. Barresi', University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.

R Laudicella (R)

Nuclear Medicine Unit of University Hospital 'AOU Policlinico G. Martino', Messina, Italy.
Department of Biomorphology, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.

O R Cotta (OR)

Department of Human Pathology 'G. Barresi', University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.

E Messina (E)

Endocrine Unit of University Hospital 'AOU Policlinico G. Martino', Messina, Italy.

F Granata (F)

Department of Biomorphology, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.
Neuroradiology Unit of University Hospital 'AOU Policlinico G. Martino', Messina, Italy.

F F Angileri (FF)

Department of Biomorphology, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.
Neurosurgery Unit of University Hospital 'AOU Policlinico G. Martino', Messina, Italy.

A Vento (A)

Nuclear Medicine Unit of University Hospital 'AOU Policlinico G. Martino', Messina, Italy.
Department of Biomorphology, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.

A Alibrandi (A)

Department of Economics, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.

S Baldari (S)

Nuclear Medicine Unit of University Hospital 'AOU Policlinico G. Martino', Messina, Italy.
Department of Biomorphology, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.

S Cannavò (S)

Endocrine Unit of University Hospital 'AOU Policlinico G. Martino', Messina, Italy.
PhD School of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.
Department of Human Pathology 'G. Barresi', University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.

Classifications MeSH