New Insights into Leaf Physiological Responses to Ozone for Use in Crop Modelling.

air pollution crop modelling leaf senescence ozone photosynthesis wheat

Journal

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2223-7747
Titre abrégé: Plants (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596181

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2019
Historique:
received: 28 02 2019
revised: 20 03 2019
accepted: 23 03 2019
entrez: 4 4 2019
pubmed: 4 4 2019
medline: 4 4 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Estimating food production under future air pollution and climate conditions in scenario analysis depends on accurately modelling ozone (O₃) effects on yield. This study tests several assumptions that form part of published approaches for modelling O₃ effects on photosynthesis and leaf duration against experimental data. In 2015 and 2016, two wheat cultivars were exposed in eight hemispherical glasshouses to O₃ ranging from 22 to 57 ppb (24 h mean), with profiles ranging from raised background to high peak treatments. The stomatal O₃ flux (Phytotoxic Ozone Dose, POD) to leaves was simulated using a multiplicative stomatal conductance model. Leaf senescence occurred earlier as average POD increased according to a linear relationship, and the two cultivars showed very different senescence responses. Negative effects of O₃ on photosynthesis were only observed alongside O₃-induced leaf senescence, suggesting that O₃ does not impair photosynthesis in un-senesced flag leaves at the realistic O₃ concentrations applied here. Accelerated senescence is therefore likely to be the dominant O₃ effect influencing yield in most agricultural environments. POD was better than 24 h mean concentration and AOT40 (accumulated O₃ exceeding 40 ppb, daylight hours) at predicting physiological response to O₃, and flux also accounted for the difference in exposure resulting from peak and high background treatments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30939811
pii: plants8040084
doi: 10.3390/plants8040084
pmc: PMC6524376
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Natural Environment Research Council
ID : DTG NE/L 501645/1

Références

Environ Pollut. 2014 Jun;189:111-7
pubmed: 24657604
Plant Physiol. 2004 Aug;135(4):2348-57
pubmed: 15299126
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 1;613-614:233-239
pubmed: 28915459
Plant Physiol. 1989 Sep;91(1):427-32
pubmed: 16667037
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 1;649:61-74
pubmed: 30172135
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2009 Nov;11 Suppl 1:70-5
pubmed: 19778370
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Sep;36(9):1658-72
pubmed: 23600481
Environ Pollut. 1997;97(1-2):91-106
pubmed: 15093382
Environ Pollut. 2014 Sep;192:295-9
pubmed: 24906864
Environ Pollut. 2007 Nov;150(1):85-95
pubmed: 17659818
Environ Pollut. 2000 Sep;109(3):393-402
pubmed: 15092872
Plant Physiol. 1991 Feb;95(2):529-35
pubmed: 16668016
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Sep;19(9):2739-52
pubmed: 23661338
Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Sep;30(9):1035-40
pubmed: 17661745
Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Aug;32(8):949-59
pubmed: 19302171
Photosynth Res. 1995 Jan;43(1):11-8
pubmed: 24306634
New Phytol. 2016 May;210(3):1130-44
pubmed: 26719951
Environ Pollut. 2015 Dec;207:21-30
pubmed: 26340296
Tree Physiol. 1987 Mar;3(1):63-91
pubmed: 14975835
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2007 Mar;9(2):320-30
pubmed: 17357024
Environ Pollut. 2012 Jun;165:147-57
pubmed: 22445923
Planta. 1980 Jun;149(1):78-90
pubmed: 24306196
Planta. 2000 Feb;210(3):454-67
pubmed: 10750904
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Apr;33(4):510-25
pubmed: 19843256
Plant Physiol. 1988 Dec;88(4):1115-9
pubmed: 16666430
Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Apr;43(4):324-336
pubmed: 32480464
J Integr Plant Biol. 2009 Apr;51(4):337-51
pubmed: 21452584
Environ Pollut. 2007 Apr;146(3):726-35
pubmed: 16766104
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Sep 15;565:95-104
pubmed: 27161131
Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Nov;29(11):2077-90
pubmed: 17081242

Auteurs

Stephanie Osborne (S)

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK. steph_osborne@hotmail.co.uk.
Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment Department, University of York, York YO10 5NG, UK. steph_osborne@hotmail.co.uk.

Divya Pandey (D)

Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment Department, University of York, York YO10 5NG, UK. pandey.divyaa85@gmail.com.

Gina Mills (G)

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK. gmi@ceh.ac.uk.

Felicity Hayes (F)

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK. fhay@ceh.ac.uk.

Harry Harmens (H)

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK. hh@ceh.ac.uk.

David Gillies (D)

Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment Department, University of York, York YO10 5NG, UK. david.gillies@york.ac.uk.

Patrick Büker (P)

Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment Department, University of York, York YO10 5NG, UK. patrick.bueker@giz.de.

Lisa Emberson (L)

Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment Department, University of York, York YO10 5NG, UK. l.emberson@york.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH