Impact of urbanization on predator and parasitoid insects at multiple spatial scales.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
28
06
2018
accepted:
06
03
2019
entrez:
4
4
2019
pubmed:
4
4
2019
medline:
20
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Landscapes are becoming increasingly urbanized, causing loss and fragmentation of natural habitats, with potentially negative effects on biodiversity. Insects are among the organisms with the largest diversity in urbanized environments. Here, we sampled predator (Ampulicidae, Sphecidae and Crabronidae) and parasitoid (Tachinidae) flower-visiting insects in 36 sites in the city of Rome (Italy). Although the diversity of herbivorous insects in urban areas mostly depends on the availability of flowering plants and nesting sites, predators and parasitoids generally require a larger number of resources during their life cycle, and are expected to be particularly influenced by urbanization. As flower-visitors can easily move between habitat patches, the effect of urbanization was tested at multiple spatial scales (local, landscape and sub-regional). We found that urbanization influenced predator and parasitoid flower-visitors at all three spatial scales. At the local scale, streets and buildings negatively influenced evenness of predators and species richness and abundance of parasitoids probably acting as dispersal barrier. At the landscape scale, higher percentage of urban decreased predator abundance, while increasing their evenness, suggesting an increase in generalist and highly mobile species. Area and compactness (i.e. Contiguity index) of urban green interactively influenced predator communities, whereas evenness of parasitoids increased with increasing Contiguity index. At the sub-regional scale, species richness and abundance of predators increased with increasing distance from the city center. Compared to previous studies testing the effect of urbanization, we found little variation in species richness, abundance and evenness along our urbanization gradient. The current insect fauna has been probably selected for its tolerance to habitat loss and fragmentation, being the result of the intensive anthropogenic alteration occurred in the area in the last centuries. Conservation strategies aimed at predator and parasitoid flying insects have to take in account variables at multiple spatial-scales, as well as the complementarity of resources across the landscape.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30943220
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214068
pii: PONE-D-18-19230
pmc: PMC6447152
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0214068Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0119276
pubmed: 25793897
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Apr;14:87-93
pubmed: 27436652
Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Feb;13(2):60-5
pubmed: 18262823
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Mar;27(3):179-88
pubmed: 22093191
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23459
pubmed: 21858128
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Apr;21(4):1652-67
pubmed: 25620599
Ecol Appl. 2016 Mar;26(2):448-62
pubmed: 27209787
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 Aug;88(3):537-49
pubmed: 23279382
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Dec;21(12):660-1; author reply 661-2
pubmed: 16996645
PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5574
pubmed: 19440367
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45822
pubmed: 23029262
Biodivers Data J. 2015 Feb 20;(3):e4187
pubmed: 25733962
PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63421
pubmed: 23717421
Ecol Evol. 2016 Aug 25;6(18):6599-6615
pubmed: 27777733
Annu Rev Entomol. 2006;51:525-55
pubmed: 16332222
Ecol Lett. 2015 Jun;18(6):581-92
pubmed: 25865805
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 22;282(1803):20142849
pubmed: 25673686
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41729
pubmed: 22876291