Concurrent Validity of Field-Based Diagnostic Technology Monitoring Movement Velocity in Powerlifting Exercises.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2021
01 Aug 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
5
4
2019
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
5
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mitter, B, Hölbling, D, Bauer, P, Stöckl, M, Baca, A, and Tschan, H. Concurrent validity of field-based diagnostic technology monitoring movement velocity in powerlifting exercises. J Strength Cond Res 35(8): 2170-2178, 2021-The study was designed to investigate the validity of different technologies used to determine movement velocity in resistance training. Twenty-four experienced powerlifters (18 male and 6 female; age, 25.1 ± 5.1 years) completed a progressive loading test in the squat, bench press, and conventional deadlift until reaching their 1 repetition maximum. Peak and mean velocity were simultaneously recorded with 4 field-based systems: GymAware (GA), FitroDyne (FD), PUSH (PU), and Beast Sensor (BS). 3D motion capturing was used to calculate specific gold standard trajectory references for each device. GA provided the most accurate output across exercises (r = 0.99-1, ES = -0.05 to 0.1). FD showed similar results for peak velocity (r = 1, standardized mean bias [ES] = -0.1 to -0.02) but considerably less validity for mean velocity (r = 0.92-0.95, ES = -0.57 to -0.29). Reasonably valid to highly valid output was provided by PU in all exercises (r = 0.91-0.97, ES = -0.5 to 0.28) and by BS in the bench press and for mean velocity in the squat (r = 0.87-0.96, ES = -0.5 to -0.06). However, BS did not reach the thresholds for reasonable validity in the deadlift and for peak velocity in the squat, mostly due to high standardized mean bias (ES = -0.78 to -0.63). In conclusion, different technologies should not be used interchangeably. Practitioners who require negligible measurement error in their assessment of movement velocity are advised to use linear position transducers over inertial sensors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30946263
pii: 00124278-202108000-00015
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003143
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2170-2178Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Alcazar J, Rodriguez-Lopez C, Ara I, et al. The force-velocity relationship in older people: Reliability and validity of a systematic procedure. Int J Sports Med 38: 1097–1104, 2017.
Appleby BB, Banyard H, Cormie P, Cormack SJ, Newton RU. Validity and reliability of methods to determine barbell displacement in heavy back squats: Implications for velocity-based training. J Strength Cond Res 34: 3118–3123, 2020.
Balsalobre-Fernández C, Kuzdub M, Poveda-Ortiz P, Campo-Vecino JD. Validity and reliability of the PUSH wearable device to measure movement velocity during the back squat exercise. J Strength Cond Res 30: 1968–1974, 2016.
Balsalobre-Fernández C, Marchante D, Baz-Valle E, et al. Analysis of wearable and smartphone-based technologies for the measurement of barbell velocity in different resistance training exercises. Front Physiol 8: 649, 2017.
Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Haff GG. Reliability and validity of the load-velocity relationship to predict the 1RM back squat. J Strength Cond Res 31: 1897–1904, 2017.
Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Vernon AD, Haff GG. The reliability of individualized load-velocity profiles. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 13: 763–769, 2018.
Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Sato K, Haff GG. Validity of various methods for determining velocity, force, and power in the back squat. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 12: 1170–1176, 2017.
Blatnik JA, Goodman CL, Capps CR, et al. Effect of load on peak power of the bar, body and system during the deadlift. J Sports Sci Med 13: 511–515, 2014.
Carroll KM, Sato K, Bazyler CD, Triplett NT, Stone MH. Increases in variation of barbell kinematics are observed with increasing intensity in a graded back squat test. Sports (Basel) 5: 51, 2017.
Fasel B. Drift Reduction for Inertial Sensor Based Orientation and Position Estimation in the Presence of High Dynamic Variability During Competitive Skiing and Daily-Life Walking [dissertation]. Lausanne, Switzerland: Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, 2017.
García-Ramos A, Torrejón A, Feriche B, et al. Prediction of the maximum number of repetitions and repetitions in reserve from barbell velocity. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 13: 353–359, 2018.
Harris NK, Cronin JB, Taylor KL, Boris J, Sheppard J. Understanding position transducer technology for strength and conditioning practitioners. Strength Cond J 32: 66–79, 2010.
Helms ER, Cronin JB, Storey A, Zourdos MC. Application of the repetitions in reserve-based rating of perceived exertion scale for resistance training. Strength Cond J 38: 42–49, 2016.
Helms ER, Storey A, Cross MR, et al. RPE and velocity relationships for the back squat, bench press, and deadlift in powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res 31: 292–297, 2017.
Hopkins WG. A spreadsheet for combining outcomes from several subject groups. Sportscience 10: 51–53, 2006.
Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 3–13, 2009.
Hopkins WG. Spreadsheets for analysis of validity and reliability. Sportscience 19: 36–44, 2015.
Hughes LJ, Banyard HG, Dempsey AR, Scott BR. Using load-velocity relationships to predict 1RM in free-weight exercise: A comparison of the different methods. J Strength Cond Res 33: 2409–2419, 2019.
Jovanovic M, Flanagan EP. Researched applications of velocity based strength training. J Aust Strength Cond 22: 58–69, 2014.
Król H, Gołaś A. Effect of barbell weight on the structure of the flat bench press. J Strength Cond Res 31: 1321–1337, 2017.
Lake JP, Lauder MA, Smith NA. Barbell kinematics should not be used to estimate barbell and body system centre of mass power in the back squat. J Strength Cond Res 26: 1302–1307, 2012.
Lorenzetti S, Lamparter T, Lüthy F. Validity and reliability of simple measurement device to assess the velocity of the barbell during squats. BMC Res Notes 10: 707, 2017.
Orange ST, Metcalfe JW, Liefeith A, et al. Validity and reliability of a wearable inertial sensor to measure velocity and power in the back squat and bench press. J Strength Cond Res 33: 2398–2408, 2019.
Picerno P. Good practice rules for the assessment of the force-velocity relationship in isoinertial resistance exercises. Asian J Sports Med 8: 1–7, 2017.
Randell AD, Cronin JB, Keogh JWL, Gill ND, Pedersen MC. Effect of instantaneous performance feedback during 6 weeks of velocity-based resistance training on sport-specific performance tests. J Strength Cond Res 25: 87–93, 2011.
Ruf L, Chéry C, Taylor KL. Validity and reliability of the load-velocity relationship to predict the one-repetition maximum in deadlift. J Strength Cond Res 32: 681–689, 2018.
Sanchez-Medina L, Perez CE, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment. Int J Sports Med 31: 123–129, 2010.
Sanchez-Medina L, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sport Exer 43: 1725–1734, 2011.
Sañudo B, Rueda D, Pozo-Cruz BD, Hoyo Mde, Carrasco L. Validation of a video analysis software package for quantifying movement velocity in resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 30: 2934–2941, 2016.
Sato KK, Beckham G, Carroll K, et al. Validity of wireless device measuring velocity of resistance exercises. J Trainol 4: 15–18, 2015.
Swinton PA, Stewart A, Agouris I, Keogh JWL, Lloyd R. A biomechanical analysis of straight and hexagonal barbell deadlifts using submaximal loads. J Strength Cond Res 25: 2000–2009, 2011.
Swinton PA, Lloyd R, Keogh JWL, Agouris I, Stewart AD. A biomechanical comparison of the traditional squat, powerlifting squat, and box squat. J Strength Cond Res 26: 1805–1816, 2012.
Vanderburgh PM, Batterham AM. Validation of the Wilks powerlifting formula. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 1869–1875, 1999.
Wamsteeker W, Sorsa K. Technical rules book. Available at: http://www.powerlifting-ipf.com/rules/technical-rules.html . Accessed June 6, 2018.
Weakley JJ, Wilson KM, Till K, et al. Visual feedback attenuates mean concentric barbell velocity loss, and improves motivation, competitiveness, and perceived workload in male adolescent athletes. J Strength Cond Res 33: 2420–2425, 2019.
Windolf M, Götzen N, Morlock M. Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems—exemplified on the Vicon-460 system. J Biomech 41: 2776–2780, 2008.