Clinical and economic aspects of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: DEPISTREC study results.
Clinical results
Economics
Newborn screening
SCID
TREC quantification
Journal
Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.)
ISSN: 1521-7035
Titre abrégé: Clin Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
04
01
2019
revised:
18
03
2019
accepted:
31
03
2019
pubmed:
5
4
2019
medline:
14
2
2020
entrez:
5
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) refers to a group of genetic disorders characterized by greatly compromised cellular and humoral immunity. Children with SCID are asymptomatic at birth, but they die from infections within the first months of life if not treated. Quantification of T-cell receptor excision circles is an extremely sensitive screening method for detecting newborns who may have SCID.The goal of the DEPISTREC study was to evaluate the feasibility of nationwide newborn screening for severe T-cell lymphopenia in France as well as its economic and clinical utility. The test universally used for neonatal screening for SCID was the quantification of TRECs on Guthrie cards. We compared a group of 190,517 babies from 48 maternities across the country who underwent newborn SCID screening with a control group of 1.4 million babies out of whom 28 were diagnosed with SCID without such screening during the course of the study. Within the screening group, 62 babies were found to be lymphopenic, including three with SCID. The cost of screening ranged from 4.7€ to €8.15 per newborn. The average 18-month cost was €257,574 vs €204,697 in the control group. In this large-scale study, we demonstrate that routine SCID screening is feasible and effective. This screening offers the additional benefit of aiding in the diagnosis of non-SCID lymphopenia. Economic evaluation allowed us to calculate the cost per test. Newborn screening may also prevent death by SCID before any curative treatment can be administered. The difference in cost between screened and control children could not be ascertained because of the very low numbers and death of one of the children tested.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30946917
pii: S1521-6616(19)30005-1
doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.03.012
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02244450']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
33-39Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.