The use of tissue fiducial markers in improving the accuracy of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy.
Fiducial marker
Image-guided radiotherapy
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Journal
Radiation oncology journal
ISSN: 2234-1900
Titre abrégé: Radiat Oncol J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101577577
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
19
12
2018
accepted:
12
02
2019
entrez:
6
4
2019
pubmed:
6
4
2019
medline:
6
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the use of a radiopaque tissue fiducial marker (TFM) in the treatment of prostate cancer patients who undergo post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (PPRT). TFM safety, its role and benefit in quantifying the set-up uncertainties in patients undergoing PPRT image-guided radiotherapy were assessed. A total of 45 consecutive PPRT patients underwent transperineal implantation of TFM at the level of vesicourethral anastomosis in the retrovesical tissue prior to intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Prostate bed motion was calculated by measuring the position of the TFM relative to the pelvic bony anatomy on daily cone-beam computed tomography. The stability and visibility of the TFM were assessed in the initial 10 patients. No postoperative complications were recorded. A total of 3,500 images were analysed. The calculated prostate bed motion for bony landmark matching relative to TFM were 2.25 mm in the left-right, 5.89 mm in the superior-inferior, and 6.59 mm in the anterior-posterior directions. A significant 36% reduction in the mean volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy (rV70) was achieved for a uniform planning target volume (PTV) margin of 7 mm compared with the Australian and New Zealand Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group recommended PTV margin of 10 mm. The use of TFM was safe and can potentially eliminate set-up errors associated with bony landmark matching, thereby allowing for tighter PTV margins and a consequent favourable reduction in dose delivered to the bladder and rectum, with potential improvements in toxicities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30947480
pii: roj.2018.00556
doi: 10.3857/roj.2018.00556
pmc: PMC6453813
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
43-50Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Sep 1;48(2):369-75
pubmed: 10974449
Radiology. 2001 May;219(2):432-9
pubmed: 11323468
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Dec 1;54(5):1314-21
pubmed: 12459352
Eur Urol. 2003 Oct;44(4):407-14
pubmed: 14499673
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jan;14(1):52-64
pubmed: 14752733
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Feb 1;67(2):356-61
pubmed: 17236961
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Feb 1;67(2):610-9
pubmed: 17236978
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jul;88(1):10-9
pubmed: 18514340
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 15;75(4):966-74
pubmed: 19619960
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Nov;93(2):246-52
pubmed: 19766339
Radiother Oncol. 2012 May;103(2):270-4
pubmed: 21890224
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):402-7
pubmed: 22381905
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Feb 1;85(2):378-84
pubmed: 22717242
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 1;87(5):932-8
pubmed: 24113055
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013 Dec;57(6):725-32
pubmed: 24283563
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Feb;110(2):256-60
pubmed: 24332022
J Nucl Med. 2014 Feb;55(2):223-32
pubmed: 24434294
Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 May;190(5):467-71
pubmed: 24557058
Brachytherapy. 2015 Nov-Dec;14(6):876-80
pubmed: 26481393
Urology. 1996 Feb;47(2):225-31
pubmed: 8607239
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Oct 1;42(3):501-6
pubmed: 9806507