Addressing preconception behaviour change through mobile phone apps: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Apps
Behaviour change
Infant
Maternal
Mobile
Perinatal
Preconception
Prenatal care
Reproductive age
Reproductive health
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 04 2019
04 04 2019
Historique:
received:
02
12
2018
accepted:
25
03
2019
entrez:
6
4
2019
pubmed:
6
4
2019
medline:
10
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many of the adverse outcomes experienced by mothers and babies are directly related to the health of the woman prior to pregnancy. This preconception period is a unique window of opportunity when women are often more motivated to optimise health and change their lifestyle in preparation for pregnancy. Several risk factors in the preconception period can contribute to adverse perinatal outcomes. These risk factors can be divided into three broad areas: biomedical, social and environmental. Mobile phone applications as a behaviour change intervention have the potential to address these risks through supporting the provision of information, healthier lifestyles and informed decision-making. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of mobile phone applications in promoting behaviour change and improving long-term outcomes for mother and babies, in women of reproductive age. This review will include trials that assess any mobile phone application (app) that assist women of reproductive age to optimise health behaviours. Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials and cluster-randomised trials will be included. The search strategy will use both MeSH and keyword combinations to search databases including the WHO Global Health Library, CINHAL, The Cochrane Library, Embase and MEDLINE for relevant studies. Retrieved citations will be screened independently by two authors to assess eligibility. Studies will be selected only if the intervention was commenced prior to pregnancy. Comparisons will be made including mobile phone applications versus text messaging-based communications or paper-based, face-to-face or telephone conversations and standard care or no specific intervention. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions will be utilised to assess the quality of included randomised studies. Primary and secondary outcomes will be compared and analysed. Results of the review will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. This systematic review is the first to assess the effects of preconception mobile phone app behaviour change and educational interventions in improving future pregnancy and maternal and child outcomes, in women of reproductive age. PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017065903 .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Many of the adverse outcomes experienced by mothers and babies are directly related to the health of the woman prior to pregnancy. This preconception period is a unique window of opportunity when women are often more motivated to optimise health and change their lifestyle in preparation for pregnancy. Several risk factors in the preconception period can contribute to adverse perinatal outcomes. These risk factors can be divided into three broad areas: biomedical, social and environmental. Mobile phone applications as a behaviour change intervention have the potential to address these risks through supporting the provision of information, healthier lifestyles and informed decision-making. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of mobile phone applications in promoting behaviour change and improving long-term outcomes for mother and babies, in women of reproductive age.
METHODS
This review will include trials that assess any mobile phone application (app) that assist women of reproductive age to optimise health behaviours. Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials and cluster-randomised trials will be included. The search strategy will use both MeSH and keyword combinations to search databases including the WHO Global Health Library, CINHAL, The Cochrane Library, Embase and MEDLINE for relevant studies. Retrieved citations will be screened independently by two authors to assess eligibility. Studies will be selected only if the intervention was commenced prior to pregnancy. Comparisons will be made including mobile phone applications versus text messaging-based communications or paper-based, face-to-face or telephone conversations and standard care or no specific intervention. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions will be utilised to assess the quality of included randomised studies. Primary and secondary outcomes will be compared and analysed. Results of the review will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines.
DISCUSSION
This systematic review is the first to assess the effects of preconception mobile phone app behaviour change and educational interventions in improving future pregnancy and maternal and child outcomes, in women of reproductive age.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017065903 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 30947750
doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0996-6
pii: 10.1186/s13643-019-0996-6
pmc: PMC6449990
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
86Références
Matern Child Health J. 2006 Sep;10(5 Suppl):S123-8
pubmed: 16897370
J Med Syst. 2014 Jan;38(1):9995
pubmed: 24346929
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Jun;30(6):477-488
pubmed: 18611299
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Mar-Apr;44(2):268-78
pubmed: 25712127
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jan;20:e19
pubmed: 30032734
Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):308-12
pubmed: 24004661
Med J Aust. 2016 Aug 15;205(4):152-4
pubmed: 27510339
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 May;58(5):426-33
pubmed: 15082745
Obstet Med. 2012 Sep;5(3):112-8
pubmed: 27582867
Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):313-8
pubmed: 23899373
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 10;4(2):e72
pubmed: 27287964
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1830-1841
pubmed: 29673873
Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 8;6(1):26
pubmed: 28179012
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 07;(4):CD007536
pubmed: 19821424
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6
pubmed: 21208779
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Oct 14;10:63
pubmed: 20946676
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2017 Dec;14:24-32
pubmed: 29195631
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006 Apr 21;55(RR-6):1-23
pubmed: 16617292
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;294(5):937-944
pubmed: 27084763
J Health Psychol. 2003 Nov;8(6):753-64
pubmed: 14670208
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;212(1):1-3
pubmed: 25529608
Women Birth. 2016 Aug;29(4):368-75
pubmed: 26874938
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;68(7):760-6
pubmed: 24781682
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 09;6(8):e10012
pubmed: 30093368
PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362
pubmed: 23349621
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD004274
pubmed: 16235356
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
PLoS Med. 2013;10(9):e1001508
pubmed: 24019762
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Mar;21(3):670-704
pubmed: 28093686