Performance of Saturated Riparian Buffers in Iowa, USA.

Nitrate from artificial drainage pipes (tiles) underlying agricultural fields is a major source of reactive N, especially NO, in surface waters. A novel approach for reducing NO loss is to intercept a field tile where it crosses a riparian buffer and divert a fraction of the flow as shallow groundwater within the buffer. This practice is called a saturated riparian buffer (SRB), and although it is promising, little data on the performance of the practice is available. This research investigated the effectiveness of SRBs in removing NO at six sites installed across Iowa, resulting in a total of 17 site-years. Water flow and NO in the tile outlets, diverted into the buffers, and NO concentration changes within the buffers were monitored throughout the year at each site. Results showed that all the SRBs were effective in removing NO from the tile outlet, with the average annual NO load removal ranging from 13 to 179 kg N for drainage areas ranging from 3.4 to 40.5 ha. This is NO that would have otherwise discharged directly into the adjoining streams. The annual removal effectiveness, which is the total NO removed in the SRB divided by the total NO draining from the field, ranged from 8 to 84%. This corresponds to an average removal rate of 0.040 g N m d with a range of 0.004 to 0.164 g N m d. Assuming a 40-yr life expectancy for the structure and a 4% discount rate, we computed a mean equal annual cost for SRBs of US$213.83. Given the average annual removal of 73 kg for all site-years, this cost equates to $2.94 kg N removed, which is very competitive with other field-edge practices such as denitrification bioreactors and constructed wetlands. Thus, SRBs continue to be a promising practice for NO removal in tile-drained landscapes.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.