Evaluation of a peer coach-led intervention to improve pain symptoms (ECLIPSE): Rationale, study design, methods, and sample characteristics.
Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Chronic Pain
/ therapy
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Mentoring
/ methods
Middle Aged
Pain Management
/ methods
Pain Measurement
Peer Group
Quality of Life
Research Design
Self Efficacy
Self-Management
/ methods
Social Support
Socioeconomic Factors
United States
Veterans
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Chronic pain
Clinical trial
Self-management
Social support
Veterans
Journal
Contemporary clinical trials
ISSN: 1559-2030
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101242342
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
10
12
2018
revised:
24
03
2019
accepted:
02
04
2019
pubmed:
6
4
2019
medline:
4
9
2020
entrez:
6
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chronic pain is prevalent, costly, and a leading cause of disability. Pain self-management (i.e., employing self-management strategies including behavioral modifications) is an effective, evidence-based treatment. However, implementation and delivery of a pain self-management model is challenging because of time and resources. Peer supported pain self-management offers a promising approach to implementing pain self-management programs using fewer clinical resources. Evaluation of a Peer Coach-Led Intervention for the Improvement of Pain Symptoms (ECLIPSE) is a randomized controlled trial testing effectiveness of peer coach-delivered pain self-management intervention versus controls receiving a class on pain and pain self-management. ECLIPSE is a Hybrid Type 1 study testing effectiveness while examining implementation factors. ECLIPSE enrolled 215 veterans randomly assigned to the peer coaching (N = 120) or control (N = 95) arm. The peer coaching intervention lasts 6 months, with patient-peer coach pairs instructed to talk twice per month. Coaches attend initial training, are provided a detailed training manual, and attend monthly booster sessions. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 9 months. The primary outcome is overall pain (intensity and interference), measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Secondary outcomes are self-efficacy, social support, pain catastrophizing, patient activation, health-related quality of life, and health care utilization. To maximize implementation potential of pain self-management, innovative delivery methods are needed that do not require additional resources from healthcare teams. A novel and promising approach is a peer-coaching model, in which patients who are successfully managing their pain offer information, ongoing support, and advice to other patients with pain. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02380690.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30951837
pii: S1551-7144(18)30747-X
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.04.002
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02380690']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
71-79Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Inc.