Evaluation of a peer coach-led intervention to improve pain symptoms (ECLIPSE): Rationale, study design, methods, and sample characteristics.


Journal

Contemporary clinical trials
ISSN: 1559-2030
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101242342

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 10 12 2018
revised: 24 03 2019
accepted: 02 04 2019
pubmed: 6 4 2019
medline: 4 9 2020
entrez: 6 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Chronic pain is prevalent, costly, and a leading cause of disability. Pain self-management (i.e., employing self-management strategies including behavioral modifications) is an effective, evidence-based treatment. However, implementation and delivery of a pain self-management model is challenging because of time and resources. Peer supported pain self-management offers a promising approach to implementing pain self-management programs using fewer clinical resources. Evaluation of a Peer Coach-Led Intervention for the Improvement of Pain Symptoms (ECLIPSE) is a randomized controlled trial testing effectiveness of peer coach-delivered pain self-management intervention versus controls receiving a class on pain and pain self-management. ECLIPSE is a Hybrid Type 1 study testing effectiveness while examining implementation factors. ECLIPSE enrolled 215 veterans randomly assigned to the peer coaching (N = 120) or control (N = 95) arm. The peer coaching intervention lasts 6 months, with patient-peer coach pairs instructed to talk twice per month. Coaches attend initial training, are provided a detailed training manual, and attend monthly booster sessions. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 9 months. The primary outcome is overall pain (intensity and interference), measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Secondary outcomes are self-efficacy, social support, pain catastrophizing, patient activation, health-related quality of life, and health care utilization. To maximize implementation potential of pain self-management, innovative delivery methods are needed that do not require additional resources from healthcare teams. A novel and promising approach is a peer-coaching model, in which patients who are successfully managing their pain offer information, ongoing support, and advice to other patients with pain. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02380690.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30951837
pii: S1551-7144(18)30747-X
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.04.002
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02380690']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

71-79

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Marianne S Matthias (MS)

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States. Electronic address: mmatthia@iupui.edu.

Joanne Daggy (J)

Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Jasma Adams (J)

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Tetla Menen (T)

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Stephanie McCalley (S)

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Marina Kukla (M)

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Alan B McGuire (AB)

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Susan Ofner (S)

Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Emilee Pierce (E)

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Carol Kempf (C)

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Michele Heisler (M)

VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Matthew J Bair (MJ)

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH