What is the treatment effect of surgery compared with nonoperative treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis at 1-year follow-up?

DLSS = degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ITT = intention-to-treat LSOS = Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study MCID = minimal clinically important difference RCT = randomized controlled trial SMD = standardized mean difference SSM = Spinal Stenosis Measure confounding degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis matching propensity score sensitivity analysis surgery

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
ISSN: 1547-5646
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Spine
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101223545

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 04 2019
Historique:
received: 06 09 2018
accepted: 22 01 2019
entrez: 6 4 2019
pubmed: 6 4 2019
medline: 6 4 2019
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of this study was to obtain an unbiased causal treatment estimate of the between-group difference of surgery versus nonoperative treatment with respect to outcomes on quality of life, pain, and disability in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) 12 months after baseline. The authors included DLSS patients from a large prospective multicenter observational cohort study. Propensity score matching was used, including 15 demographic, clinical, and MRI variables. Linear and logistic mixed-effects regression models were applied to quantify the between-group treatment effect. Unmeasured confounding was addressed in a sensitivity analysis, assessing the robustness of the results. A total of 408 patients were included in this study, 222 patients after matching, with 111 in each treatment group. Patients with nonoperative treatment had lower quality of life at the 12-month follow-up (−6.21 points, 95% CI −9.93 to −2.49) as well as lower chances of reaching a minimal clinically important difference in Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM) symptoms (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.53) and SSM function (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.49), than patients undergoing surgery. These results were very robust in case of unmeasured confounding. The surgical complication rate was low; 5 (4.5%) patients experienced a durotomy during intervention, and 5 (4.5%) patients underwent re-decompression. The authors used propensity score matching to assess the difference in treatment efficacy of surgery compared with nonoperative treatment in elderly patients with DLSS. This study delivers strong evidence that surgical treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment. It helps in clinical decision-making, especially when patients suffer for a long time, sometimes over many years, hoping for a spontaneous improvement of their symptoms. In light of these new results, the number of years with disability can hopefully be reduced by providing adequate treatment at the right time for this ever-growing elderly and frail population. DLSS = degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; ITT = intention-to-treat; LSOS = Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study; MCID = minimal clinically important difference; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SMD = standardized mean difference; SSM = Spinal Stenosis Measure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30952135
doi: 10.3171/2019.1.SPINE181098
pii: 2019.1.SPINE181098
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-9

Auteurs

Ulrike Held (U)

Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich.
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich.

Johann Steurer (J)

Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich.

Giuseppe Pichierri (G)

Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich.

Maria M Wertli (MM)

Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern.

Mazda Farshad (M)

Spine Division, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich.

Florian Brunner (F)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rheumatology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich.

Roman Guggenberger (R)

Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich.

François Porchet (F)

Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich; and.

Tamás F Fekete (TF)

Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich; and.

Urs D Schmid (UD)

Department of Neurosurgery, Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland.

Isaac Gravestock (I)

Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich.

Jakob M Burgstaller (JM)

Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich.

Classifications MeSH