Success Rate of Intra-articular Sacroiliac Joint Injection: Fluoroscopy vs Ultrasound Guidance-A Cadaveric Study.


Journal

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
ISSN: 1526-4637
Titre abrégé: Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100894201

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 7 4 2019
medline: 25 8 2020
entrez: 7 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Given the unacceptably high miss rates of non-image-guided injections into the sacroiliac joint, either fluoroscopy or ultrasound is recommended for guidance. The real success rate of both techniques was assessed by cadaver dissection. Twenty bodies donated to science (40 joints: 15 female and 5 male) were investigated bilaterally. Fluoroscopy and a lower ultrasound-guided approach were performed in 10 bodies each. Conditions during puncture, the subjective feeling of the needle being intra-articular, and, for fluoroscopic guidance, the intra-articular spread of the contrast were assessed. First, 0.5 cc of Iopamidol was injected, followed by 2 mL of red-colored latex. The spread was investigated by dissection via anterior opening of the sacroiliac joint and the dorsal ligaments. Ultrasound guidance was used in 1/20 (5%, 95% CI = 0.9-23.6%) intra-articular injections. In 19/20 (95%, 95% CI = 0.9-23.6%) cases, latex spread in the interosseous sacroiliac ligament was used. Conditions of structural visibility were classified as good in 11/20 (55%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%) cases, puncture condition as good in 16/20 (80%, 95% CI = 58.4-91.9%) cases, and subjective feeling of the needle being intra-articular was present in 10/20 (50%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%) cases. Fluoroscopy showed an intra-articular injection in 10/20 (50%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%) cases. The structure visibility in fluoroscopy was good in 9/20 (45%, 95% CI = 25.8-65.8%), puncture conditions good in 8/20 (40%, 95% CI = 21.9-61.3%), intra-articular contrast spread visible in 10/20 (50%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%), and subjective feeling of being intra-articular was present in 17/20 (85%, 95% CI = 64.0-94.8%) cases. Fluoroscopy clearly showed a higher success rate of intra-articular sacroiliac joint injection.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Given the unacceptably high miss rates of non-image-guided injections into the sacroiliac joint, either fluoroscopy or ultrasound is recommended for guidance. The real success rate of both techniques was assessed by cadaver dissection.
METHODS
Twenty bodies donated to science (40 joints: 15 female and 5 male) were investigated bilaterally. Fluoroscopy and a lower ultrasound-guided approach were performed in 10 bodies each. Conditions during puncture, the subjective feeling of the needle being intra-articular, and, for fluoroscopic guidance, the intra-articular spread of the contrast were assessed. First, 0.5 cc of Iopamidol was injected, followed by 2 mL of red-colored latex. The spread was investigated by dissection via anterior opening of the sacroiliac joint and the dorsal ligaments.
RESULTS
Ultrasound guidance was used in 1/20 (5%, 95% CI = 0.9-23.6%) intra-articular injections. In 19/20 (95%, 95% CI = 0.9-23.6%) cases, latex spread in the interosseous sacroiliac ligament was used. Conditions of structural visibility were classified as good in 11/20 (55%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%) cases, puncture condition as good in 16/20 (80%, 95% CI = 58.4-91.9%) cases, and subjective feeling of the needle being intra-articular was present in 10/20 (50%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%) cases. Fluoroscopy showed an intra-articular injection in 10/20 (50%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%) cases. The structure visibility in fluoroscopy was good in 9/20 (45%, 95% CI = 25.8-65.8%), puncture conditions good in 8/20 (40%, 95% CI = 21.9-61.3%), intra-articular contrast spread visible in 10/20 (50%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%), and subjective feeling of being intra-articular was present in 17/20 (85%, 95% CI = 64.0-94.8%) cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Fluoroscopy clearly showed a higher success rate of intra-articular sacroiliac joint injection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30953589
pii: 5430238
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz059
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0
Iothalamic Acid 16CHD79MIX

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1890-1897

Informations de copyright

© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Wolfgang Stelzer (W)

Schmerzlos Zentrum, Linz, Austria.

Dominik Stelzer (D)

Schmerzlos Zentrum, Linz, Austria.

Elisabeth Stelzer (E)

Schmerzlos Zentrum, Linz, Austria.

Andreas Sammer (A)

CHAIR of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Elisabeth Aichner (E)

CHAIR of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Monika Braune (M)

Schmerzlos Zentrum, Linz, Austria.

Byron J Schneider (BJ)

Department of PM&R, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

C Duller (C)

Institute of Applied Statistics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.

Georg Feigl (G)

CHAIR of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH