Estimation of nuclear DNA content and its variation among Indian Tea accessions by flow cytometry.

2C DNA Genome size Indian Tea Internal standard

Journal

Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology
ISSN: 0971-5894
Titre abrégé: Physiol Mol Biol Plants
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101304333

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 20 01 2018
revised: 14 07 2018
accepted: 24 07 2018
entrez: 9 4 2019
pubmed: 9 4 2019
medline: 9 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Nuclear DNA content and genome size variation among 36 Indian tea accessions were analyzed by flow cytometry. Initial standardization of protocols for isolation of nuclei, DNA staining and selection of an internal standard for tea accessions which have significantly high amount of phenolic secondary metabolites in their cytosol was carried out. Results obtained revealed that 2C DNA content of Indian tea is 7.46 pg which corresponds to 1C genome size of 3673 Mb. Inter accession variation in 2C DNA content was also observed among 35 diploid taxa ranging from 7.23 to 7.73 pg which was significant at 1% probability level. The 2C DNA content of triploid (UPASI 3) was observed to be 11.47 pg which is concurrent with the expected value. Results obtained showed that Assam and Cambod type tea accession have higher 2C DNA content of 7.73 pg whereas Assam Cambod hybrids and Assam China hybrids have reduction in DNA content with 2C amounts, 7.23 and 7.32 pg DNA respectively. The present study suggests that the species involved in origin of Indian tea must have differed in their genome sizes owing to significant inter accession variation in nuclear DNA content.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30956418
doi: 10.1007/s12298-018-0587-3
pii: 587
pmc: PMC6419702
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

339-346

Références

Am J Bot. 1999 May;86(5):609-13
pubmed: 10330063
Genetica. 2002 May;115(1):37-47
pubmed: 12188047
Ann Bot. 2002 Sep;90(3):345-51
pubmed: 12234146
Plant Cell. 1997 Sep;9(9):1509-1514
pubmed: 12237393
Cytometry A. 2003 Feb;51(2):127-8; author reply 129
pubmed: 12541287
Ann Bot. 2003 Jul;92(1):21-9
pubmed: 12824068
Trends Genet. 2003 Sep;19(9):485-8
pubmed: 12957541
Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):91-8
pubmed: 15596458
Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):127-32
pubmed: 15596462
Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):201-6
pubmed: 15596467
Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):255-60
pubmed: 15596473
Ann Bot. 2006 Sep;98(3):679-89
pubmed: 16820407
Ann Bot. 2006 Sep;98(3):665-78
pubmed: 16868002
Genome Res. 2006 Oct;16(10):1262-9
pubmed: 16963705
Genome Res. 2007 Jul;17(7):1072-81
pubmed: 17556529
Science. 1983 Jun 3;220(4601):1049-51
pubmed: 17754551
Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(6):1323-35
pubmed: 17921526
Genome. 1996 Oct;39(5):890-7
pubmed: 18469942
Biochem Genet. 2010 Aug;48(7-8):549-64
pubmed: 20390337
Ann Bot. 2011 Mar;107(3):467-590
pubmed: 21257716
PLoS One. 2013 May 27;8(5):e64981
pubmed: 23724111
Theor Appl Genet. 1994 May;88(2):261-6
pubmed: 24185936
Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Jun;88(3-4):429-32
pubmed: 24186030
Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Sep;86(8):1001-6
pubmed: 24194009
Theor Appl Genet. 1990 Apr;79(4):470-4
pubmed: 24226450
Chromosoma. 1967;23(1):14-23
pubmed: 5583329
Genome. 1995 Apr;38(2):201-10
pubmed: 7774794

Auteurs

Suman Sharma (S)

1Department of Botany, Ramjas College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi 110007 India.

Sandeep Kaushik (S)

2Department of Environmental Science, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Lalpur, Amarkantak, Madhya Pradesh 484887 India.

Soom Nath Raina (SN)

3Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201303 India.

Classifications MeSH