Is the Optimal Load for Maximal Power Output During Hang Power Cleans Submaximal?
1-repetition maximum
Olympic weight lifting
power training
squat position
Journal
International journal of sports physiology and performance
ISSN: 1555-0273
Titre abrégé: Int J Sports Physiol Perform
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101276430
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2020
01 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
14
11
2018
revised:
10
02
2019
accepted:
03
03
2019
medline:
9
4
2019
pubmed:
9
4
2019
entrez:
9
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The optimal load for maximal power output during hang power cleans (HPCs) from a mechanical perspective is the 1-repetition-maximum (1RM) load; however, previous research has reported otherwise. The present study thus aimed to investigate the underlying factors that determine optimal load during HPCs. Eight competitive Olympic weight lifters performed HPCs at 40%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% of their 1RM while the ground-reaction force and bar/body kinematics were simultaneously recorded. The success criterion during HPC was set above parallel squat at the receiving position. Both peak power and relative peak power were maximized at 80% 1RM (3975.7 [439.1] W, 50.4 [6.6] W/kg, respectively). Peak force, force at peak power, and relative values tended to increase with heavier loads (P < .001), while peak system velocity and system velocity at peak power decreased significantly above 80% 1RM (P = .005 and .011, respectively). There were also significant decreases in peak bar velocity (P < .001) and bar displacement (P < .001) toward heavier loads. There was a strong positive correlation between peak bar velocity and bar displacement in 7 of 8 subjects (r > .90, P < .01). The knee joint angle at the receiving position fell below the quarter-squat position above 70% 1RM. Submaximal loads were indeed optimal for maximal power output for HPC when the success criterion was set above the parallel-squat position. However, when the success criterion was defined as the quarter-squat position, the optimal load became the 1RM load.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30958042
pii: ijspp.2018-0894
doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0894
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM