Barriers to the adoption of ventilator-associated events surveillance and prevention.
prevention
quality improvement
surveillance
ventilator-associated events ventilator-associated pneumonia
Journal
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
08
01
2019
revised:
28
02
2019
accepted:
28
03
2019
pubmed:
10
4
2019
medline:
9
1
2020
entrez:
10
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The CDC expanded the purview of safety surveillance for ventilated patients from ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) to ventilator-associated events (VAE) in 2013. CDC created VAE definitions to simplify surveillance, increase objectivity, and broaden prevention efforts. Many U.S. hospitals are conducting VAE surveillance but uptake beyond the U.S. has been limited. Review of recent publications suggest three major barriers to the adoption of VAE surveillance and prevention: 1) ongoing uncertainty about VAE and concern about its limited overlap with clinically-defined VAP, 2) a paucity of studies defining risk factors for VAEs and how best to prevent VAEs, and 3) lack of emphasis on VAE surveillance and prevention by regulatory agencies. Emerging data partially address the first two points. Possible VAPs missed by VAE surveillance are associated with lower mortality rates than VAEs and have similar outcomes whether treated with ≤3 days of antibiotics or more conventional courses, suggesting VAE focuses surveillance on severe events. Potentially-modifiable VAE risk factors include deep sedation, positive fluid balance, blood transfusions, and mandatory modes of mechanical ventilation with high inspiratory pressures. Potential interventions to prevent VAEs include avoiding intubation, minimizing sedation, paired daily spontaneous awakening and breathing trials, conservative fluid management, conservative transfusion thresholds, low tidal volume ventilation, and early mobility. There are important limitations to all existing prevention studies, however, and no study has thus far has tested a VAE prevention bundle that includes all these interventions. Further work is needed to better define the clinical significance of VAPs missed by VAE surveillance, to rigorously evaluate the impact of an optimized VAE prevention bundle on VAEs and other outcomes, and to weigh whether these additional data provide adequate evidence to support mandating VAE surveillance and prevention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30965099
pii: S1198-743X(19)30148-X
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.027
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1180-1185Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.