Characterization of minimal lesions related to the presence of visna/maedi virus in the mammary gland and milk of dairy sheep.
Histopathology
Lentivirus
Mammary gland
Milk
Minimal lesions
Sheep
Visna maedi
Journal
BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Apr 2019
10 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
28
06
2018
accepted:
27
03
2019
entrez:
11
4
2019
pubmed:
11
4
2019
medline:
30
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In order to characterize the complete range of lesions, especially minimal, affecting mammary gland and viral antigen distribution and target cells using immunohistochemistry in naturally Visna/maedi (VM) 84 infected sheep were studied, forty-four from flocks with clinical cases (A) and 35 randomly sampled from two abattoirs (B) together with five negative controls (C). An immunocytochemistry technique was developed and further milk samples (n = 39) were used to study viral excretion, carrier cells and the role of milk and colostrum in the transmission of the disease. All sheep from group C and three sheep from group B were negative to VM in tissue sections by histopathology, immunohistochemistry and PCR, and also in serum using ELISA. Several degrees of CD3 + lymphocytic interstitial mastitis were observed in groups A and B: minimal (+) n = 26 sheep; moderate (++), n = 32 and severe (+++), n = 12. No differences in lesion distribution were observed between groups A and B. Viral presence was confirmed by immunohistochemistry using two different antibodies and/or PCR in every tissue with lesions while serology was negative in six sheep with lesions. Two milk samples taken from milk tanks from two flocks from group A and fourteen milk samples from 29 infected sheep from group B were positive to VM (most of them from animals with moderate and severe lesions). Positivity was only found in macrophages, even in focal and minimal lesions, while no positivity was observed in epithelial or any other cells in either tissue and milk samples. This new observation of the minimal lesions described in this work increased the prevalence of VM lesions in mammary gland up to 90.9% and VM should be considered as a differential diagnosis when minimal interstitial lesions are detected. A high prevalence of VM was observed in intensive milk-producing sheep, ELISA serology did not detect as positivity all infected animals, while histology, IHC or PCR showed higher sensitivity. The cytological technique developed was very useful in milk-cell studies using hematoxylin and eosin and immunocytochemistry. Viral detection in milk samples (16/39) confirms a potential but limited role of milk/colostrum in viral transmission.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In order to characterize the complete range of lesions, especially minimal, affecting mammary gland and viral antigen distribution and target cells using immunohistochemistry in naturally Visna/maedi (VM) 84 infected sheep were studied, forty-four from flocks with clinical cases (A) and 35 randomly sampled from two abattoirs (B) together with five negative controls (C). An immunocytochemistry technique was developed and further milk samples (n = 39) were used to study viral excretion, carrier cells and the role of milk and colostrum in the transmission of the disease.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All sheep from group C and three sheep from group B were negative to VM in tissue sections by histopathology, immunohistochemistry and PCR, and also in serum using ELISA. Several degrees of CD3 + lymphocytic interstitial mastitis were observed in groups A and B: minimal (+) n = 26 sheep; moderate (++), n = 32 and severe (+++), n = 12. No differences in lesion distribution were observed between groups A and B. Viral presence was confirmed by immunohistochemistry using two different antibodies and/or PCR in every tissue with lesions while serology was negative in six sheep with lesions. Two milk samples taken from milk tanks from two flocks from group A and fourteen milk samples from 29 infected sheep from group B were positive to VM (most of them from animals with moderate and severe lesions). Positivity was only found in macrophages, even in focal and minimal lesions, while no positivity was observed in epithelial or any other cells in either tissue and milk samples.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This new observation of the minimal lesions described in this work increased the prevalence of VM lesions in mammary gland up to 90.9% and VM should be considered as a differential diagnosis when minimal interstitial lesions are detected. A high prevalence of VM was observed in intensive milk-producing sheep, ELISA serology did not detect as positivity all infected animals, while histology, IHC or PCR showed higher sensitivity. The cytological technique developed was very useful in milk-cell studies using hematoxylin and eosin and immunocytochemistry. Viral detection in milk samples (16/39) confirms a potential but limited role of milk/colostrum in viral transmission.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30967151
doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1855-3
pii: 10.1186/s12917-019-1855-3
pmc: PMC6456970
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
109Subventions
Organisme : Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León
ID : LE361A12-1
Organisme : Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte
ID : FPU13/01081
Références
Vet Res. 1999 Sep-Oct;30(5):467-74
pubmed: 10543381
J Virol. 2000 Nov;74(21):10096-103
pubmed: 11024138
J Virol Methods. 2003 Feb;107(2):121-7
pubmed: 12505625
Prev Vet Med. 2003 Sep 12;60(4):265-79
pubmed: 12941552
J Vet Diagn Invest. 1999 Sep;11(5):432-5
pubmed: 12968756
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1957 Jul;16(3):389-403
pubmed: 13439402
Eur J Histochem. 2003;47(4):373-8
pubmed: 14706934
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Dec 9;104(3-4):157-64
pubmed: 15564024
Res Vet Sci. 2005 Jun;78(3):237-43
pubmed: 15766943
Vet Microbiol. 2005 Apr 25;107(1-2):49-62
pubmed: 15795077
Res Vet Sci. 2006 Apr;80(2):235-41
pubmed: 16005917
Vet Res. 2006 Jan-Feb;37(1):133-44
pubmed: 16336930
AIDS Rev. 2005 Oct-Dec;7(4):233-45
pubmed: 16425963
Vet Rec. 1991 Jul 20;129(3):51-4
pubmed: 1656581
J Virol Methods. 2006 Nov;137(2):317-24
pubmed: 16908077
Anat Histol Embryol. 2007 Jun;36(3):168-71
pubmed: 17535346
Vet J. 2010 Nov;186(2):221-5
pubmed: 19747864
Infect Genet Evol. 2010 Oct;10(7):998-1007
pubmed: 20601169
J Comp Pathol. 2012 Jul;147(1):1-10
pubmed: 22000038
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 May;35(3):259-69
pubmed: 22237012
J Neurovirol. 2012 Dec;18(6):532-7
pubmed: 23076997
Vet J. 2013 Sep;197(3):607-12
pubmed: 23643869
Res Vet Sci. 1989 Jan;46(1):5-8
pubmed: 2537992
Vet Microbiol. 2015 Dec 14;181(1-2):75-89
pubmed: 26371852
J Comp Pathol. 2018 Feb;159:49-56
pubmed: 29599005
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):7086-90
pubmed: 2996004
Virology. 1985 Nov;147(1):231-6
pubmed: 2998068
Aust Vet J. 1986 Aug;63(8):242-5
pubmed: 3024612
Vet Pathol. 1971;8(1):63-80
pubmed: 5157932
Acta Vet Scand. 1980;21(4):689-98
pubmed: 6261559
Am J Vet Res. 1981 Sep;42(9):1554-9
pubmed: 6275756
Aust Vet J. 1983 Nov;60(11):326-9
pubmed: 6320791
J Dairy Res. 1981 Jun;48(2):225-37
pubmed: 7298960
J Virol. 1995 Mar;69(3):1400-7
pubmed: 7853472
Vet Pathol. 1994 Nov;31(6):695-703
pubmed: 7863586
J Virol. 1993 Sep;67(9):5187-97
pubmed: 8394444
Vet Res. 1998 May-Aug;29(3-4):341-67
pubmed: 9689746