Phenotyping of hip-knee-ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability.
Adolescent
Adult
Ankle Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Biomechanical Phenomena
Classification
Cohort Studies
Female
Femur
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Knee Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Phenotype
Registries
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Sex Factors
Tibia
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult
Alignment
CT
Classification
Coronal
HKA
Hip–knee–ankle angle
Knee
Native
Phenotype
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
29
01
2019
accepted:
04
04
2019
pubmed:
11
4
2019
medline:
3
8
2019
entrez:
11
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is a lack of knowledge about the native coronal knee alignment in 3D. The currently used classification system (neutral, valgus and varus) oversimplifies the coronal knee alignment. The purpose of this study was therefore (1) to investigate the coronal knee alignment in non-osteoarthritic knees using 3D-reconstructed CT images and (2) to introduce a classification system for the overall knee alignment based on phenotypes. The hospital registry was searched for patients younger than 45 years and older than 16, who received a CT according to the Imperial Knee Protocol. Patients with prosthesis, osteoarthritis, fractures or injury of the collateral ligaments were excluded. Finally, 308 non-osteoarthritic knees of 160 patients remained (102 males and 58 females, mean age ± standard deviation (SD) 30 ± 7 years). The overall lower limb alignment was defined as the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), which is formed by lines connecting the centers of the femoral head, the knee and the talus. The angle was measured using a commercially planning software (KneePLAN 3D, Symbios, Yverdon les Bains, Switzerland). Descriptive statistics, such as means, ranges, and measures of variance (e.g., standard deviations) are presented. Based on these results, the currently used classification system was evaluated and a new system, based on phenotypes, was introduced. These phenotypes consist of a phenotype-specific mean value (a HKA value) and cover a range of ± 1.5° from this mean (e.g., 183° ± 1.5°). The mean values represent 3° increments of the angle starting from the overall mean value (mean HKA = 180°; 3° increments = 183° and 177°, 186° and 174°). The distribution of these limb phenotypes was assessed. The overall mean HKA was 179.7° ± 2.9° varus and values ranged from 172.6° varus to 187.1° valgus. The mean HKA values for male and female were 179.2° ± 2.8° and 180.5° ± 2.8°, respectively, which implied a significant gender difference (r The measurements using 3D-reconstructed CT images confirmed the great variability of the overall lower limb alignment in non-osteoarthritic knees. However, the currently used classification system (neutral, varus, valgus) oversimplifies the coronal alignment and therefore the introduced classification system, based on limb phenotypes, should be used. This will help to better understand individual coronal knee alignment. Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30968238
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05507-1
pii: 10.1007/s00167-019-05507-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1378-1384Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82(11):1603-8
pubmed: 11097451
Acta Orthop. 2005 Jun;76(3):403-7
pubmed: 16156470
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87 Suppl 2:71-80
pubmed: 16326726
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Nov;88(11):1513-8
pubmed: 17075100
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun;24(4):570-8
pubmed: 18534396
J Orthop Res. 2009 Sep;27(9):1191-6
pubmed: 19242980
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):629-33
pubmed: 21511928
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):45-53
pubmed: 21656315
Int Orthop. 2012 Jun;36(6):1291-7
pubmed: 22095137
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jun;(255):215-27
pubmed: 2347155
Knee. 2014 Mar;21(2):549-52
pubmed: 23849161
Knee. 2014 Mar;21(2):544-8
pubmed: 24139813
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015 Mar;27(1):49-55
pubmed: 25750894
Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3398-404
pubmed: 25929941
Acta Med Iran. 2015;53(5):293-6
pubmed: 26024704
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Mar;137(3):393-400
pubmed: 28110363
Int Orthop. 2017 Oct;41(10):2009-2016
pubmed: 28236072
Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):1146-1152
pubmed: 28800855
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1359-1367
pubmed: 30848310
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Jun;69(5):745-9
pubmed: 3597474
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Jan;59(1):77-9
pubmed: 833180
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997 Jan;5(1):39-47
pubmed: 9010877