The Influence of Light on Olive (

cyto-histological observations endocarp fruit oil content fruit shading mesocarp

Journal

Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 11 05 2018
accepted: 13 03 2019
entrez: 12 4 2019
pubmed: 12 4 2019
medline: 12 4 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In olive, the response to environmental conditions, such as light availability, is under genetic control and requires a combination of biochemical and physiological events. We investigated the effect of irradiance in fruit development in two Italian cultivars, Leccino and Frantoio. Morphological and cyto-histological analyses, as well as water and oil content determination, were carried out in fruits exposed to a different light regime (named as light and shade fruits). Results demonstrated that the influence of light availability on fruit development depends on the cultivar. In Leccino, the fresh and the dry weight, the percentage of dry matter, the kernel and fruit diameter, the mesocarp thickness and the mesocarp cell size were higher in the light exposed fruits than in the ones grown in the shade. In Frantoio, differences between light and shade fruits were observed only at 140 DAF (Days After Flowering) and only in the kernel and fruit diameter and in the dry and fresh weight, which were higher in the light exposed fruits. Leccino, therefore, showed a greater sensitivity to the light availability. This may be related to the observed delay in the endocarp lignification as compared to the Frantoio cultivar. In each cultivar, moreover, shade and light fruits did not show differences in the timing of cell differentiation. Finally, the investigation of oil storage carried out in cyto-histological studies demonstrated that differences in oil content between fruit subjected to different light regimes correlated with the number of oil containing cells, rather than the oil content per cell. A different behaviour was observed in the two cultivars: in Leccino, the mesocarp cell size was almost twice of Frantoio, while oil drops were only 30% larger; therefore, the percentage of cell volume occupied by the oil drops was lower in Leccino than in Frantoio. The chemical analysis confirmed this observation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30972098
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00385
pmc: PMC6446062
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

385

Références

Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1439-1451
pubmed: 12271039
Ann Bot. 2003 Sep;92(3):415-24
pubmed: 12853282
J Plant Physiol. 2008 Oct 9;165(15):1545-62
pubmed: 18571766
Tree Physiol. 2009 Dec;29(12):1575-85
pubmed: 19825868
J Sci Food Agric. 2015 Sep;95(12):2473-81
pubmed: 25355375
J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Aug;97(11):3530-3539
pubmed: 28071794

Auteurs

Lara Reale (L)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Luigi Nasini (L)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Martina Cerri (M)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Luca Regni (L)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Francesco Ferranti (F)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Primo Proietti (P)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH