Surgery for adrenal angiomyelolipoma: an individualized concept.

BACKGROUND

Because adrenal angiomyelolipoma (AAML) is rare and uniformly benign, the indications for surgery are ill defined.

METHODS

Among a series of 156 patients with adrenal pathologies surgically treated between 2013 and 2018, 12 patients were operated with the diagnosis of an AAML. The clinical as well as imaging parameters forming the individual indications for surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

Preoperative diagnosis consistent with AAML was made in all 12 patients. The mean size of surgically removed AAML was 82.3 mm (45-150 mm). Gender and affected side were evenly distributed. Local symptoms but lack of radiological signs suspicious for malignancy or size increase were observed in 4 of 12 patients (group 1, 33%). In contrast, 4 of 12 patients (group 2, 33%) showed radiological signs suspicious for malignancy but lacked local symptoms. Additional 4 of 12 patients (group 3, 33%) showed both local symptoms and radiological signs suspicious for malignancy. Patients with local symptoms harbored significantly larger tumors compared to those patients that lacked local symptoms (93.9 mm ± 32.8 vs. 59.3 mm ± 2.7, p = 0.021). Patients with radiologically suspicious signs were older (60 years ± 9.9 vs. 53 years ± 5.4, p > 0.05), and time to surgery was shorter (4.4 months ± 3 vs. 6.0 months ± 3.0, p > 0.05). Importantly, surgical approach was not influenced by tumor size (p = 0.65). However, patients with suspicious imaging were more likely to be operated by conventional open approach (4 of 8 vs. 0 of 4, p = 0.08). The minimal invasive approach was associated with shorter hospital stay (7 days, ± 1.3 vs. 14.2 days, ± 8.8, p = 0.038). All lesions that showed radiological signs suspicious for malignancy proved benign in final histology.

CONCLUSION

Large AAML present a clinical challenge. The presence of local symptoms and/or radiological signs suspicious for malignancy identifies three groups of patients that define the concept of an individualized indication for surgery in AAML. A minimal invasive approach can be advocated even for large AAML with radiological signs suspicious for malignancy.