Evaluation of standard pyrethroid based LNs (MiraNet and MagNet) in experimental huts against pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae s.l. M'bé, Côte d'Ivoire: Potential for impact on vectorial capacity.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
12
11
2018
accepted:
26
03
2019
entrez:
12
4
2019
pubmed:
12
4
2019
medline:
28
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is evidence from experimental hut and household studies that the entomological efficacy of long lasting pyrethroid treated nets (LLINs) is compromised in areas of pyrethroid resistance. The rapid increase in resistance intensity in African malaria vectors could further undermine the performance of these nets. The pyrethroid resistance intensity in Anopheles gambiae s.l. M'bé from central Côte d'Ivoire is reported to be high (> 1700 fold). Whether this translates into an increase in entomological indicators of malaria transmission needs investigation. The efficacy of two long lasting insecticidal nets (LN) MiraNet and MagNet, both alpha-cypermethrin based was evaluated in experimental huts against pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae in M'bé, central Côte d'Ivoire. All nets were deliberately holed to simulate wear-and-tear and were tested unwashed and after 20 standardized washes. The entry rates of An. gambiae s.l. into huts with insecticide treated nets were 62-84% lower than entry into huts with untreated nets (p < 0.001). Exit rates of An. gambiae s.l. with unwashed MiraNet and MagNet LNs were significantly greater than with untreated nets (50-60% vs 26%) and this effect after washing 20 times nets did not decrease. Blood-feeding with both nets was significantly inhibited relative to the untreated reference net (31-55%) (p < 0.001). Washing MiraNet LN 20 times had no significant impact on protection against An. gambiae s.l. bites but it did cause a significant fall by 40% in protection with MagNet LN (p < 0.001). All insecticide treated nets induced higher mortality of An. gambiae s.l. than the untreated net (p < 0.05). The impact though significant was limited (14-30%). The personal protection against An. gambiae s.l. bites derived from all treatments was high (75-90%). The overall insecticidal effect was compromised by pyrethroid resistance and was not detectable in some treatments. In this area of high pyrethroid resistance intensity (over 1700 fold), both MiraNet and MagNet LNs still conferred appreciable personal protection against mosquito bites despite inducing only slightly greater mortality of pyrethroid resistant Anopheles mosquitoes than untreated nets. The impact is comparable to moderately intense Benin resistance area (207 fold) and Burkina Faso (over 1000 fold). This preserved level of protection plus the small but sensitive killing of mosquitoes may continue to impact vectorial capacity despite high intensity of resistance. Nevertheless, there is an obvious need for strategies and nets with novel mode of action to enhance vector control.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is evidence from experimental hut and household studies that the entomological efficacy of long lasting pyrethroid treated nets (LLINs) is compromised in areas of pyrethroid resistance. The rapid increase in resistance intensity in African malaria vectors could further undermine the performance of these nets. The pyrethroid resistance intensity in Anopheles gambiae s.l. M'bé from central Côte d'Ivoire is reported to be high (> 1700 fold). Whether this translates into an increase in entomological indicators of malaria transmission needs investigation.
METHOD
The efficacy of two long lasting insecticidal nets (LN) MiraNet and MagNet, both alpha-cypermethrin based was evaluated in experimental huts against pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae in M'bé, central Côte d'Ivoire. All nets were deliberately holed to simulate wear-and-tear and were tested unwashed and after 20 standardized washes.
RESULTS
The entry rates of An. gambiae s.l. into huts with insecticide treated nets were 62-84% lower than entry into huts with untreated nets (p < 0.001). Exit rates of An. gambiae s.l. with unwashed MiraNet and MagNet LNs were significantly greater than with untreated nets (50-60% vs 26%) and this effect after washing 20 times nets did not decrease. Blood-feeding with both nets was significantly inhibited relative to the untreated reference net (31-55%) (p < 0.001). Washing MiraNet LN 20 times had no significant impact on protection against An. gambiae s.l. bites but it did cause a significant fall by 40% in protection with MagNet LN (p < 0.001). All insecticide treated nets induced higher mortality of An. gambiae s.l. than the untreated net (p < 0.05). The impact though significant was limited (14-30%). The personal protection against An. gambiae s.l. bites derived from all treatments was high (75-90%). The overall insecticidal effect was compromised by pyrethroid resistance and was not detectable in some treatments.
CONCLUSION
In this area of high pyrethroid resistance intensity (over 1700 fold), both MiraNet and MagNet LNs still conferred appreciable personal protection against mosquito bites despite inducing only slightly greater mortality of pyrethroid resistant Anopheles mosquitoes than untreated nets. The impact is comparable to moderately intense Benin resistance area (207 fold) and Burkina Faso (over 1000 fold). This preserved level of protection plus the small but sensitive killing of mosquitoes may continue to impact vectorial capacity despite high intensity of resistance. Nevertheless, there is an obvious need for strategies and nets with novel mode of action to enhance vector control.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30973948
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215074
pii: PONE-D-18-32439
pmc: PMC6459542
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insecticides
0
Pyrethrins
0
cypermethrin
1TR49121NP
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0215074Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):e0165925
pubmed: 27851828
Trends Parasitol. 2016 Mar;32(3):187-196
pubmed: 26826784
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 03;9(4):e93603
pubmed: 24699827
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 03;9(2):e87710
pubmed: 24498360
Malar J. 2015 May 20;14:210
pubmed: 25985896
Malar J. 2013 Oct 24;12:368
pubmed: 24156715
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Sep 14;8(356):356ra121
pubmed: 27629488
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Oct;20(10):1691-6
pubmed: 25279965
Parasite. 2018;25:42
pubmed: 30088473
Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):207-211
pubmed: 26375008
Malar J. 2017 May 8;16(1):190
pubmed: 28482891
Malar J. 2015 Jan 28;14:31
pubmed: 25627987
Trends Parasitol. 2002 Apr;18(4):161-3
pubmed: 11998703
Malar J. 2017 May 26;16(1):225
pubmed: 28549431
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;13(2):199-206
pubmed: 17479880
Evol Appl. 2017 Dec 04;11(4):431-441
pubmed: 29636797
Malar J. 2017 Aug 16;16(1):340
pubmed: 28814307
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;18(7):1101-6
pubmed: 22709930
Elife. 2016 Aug 22;5:
pubmed: 27547988
Malar J. 2010 Jan 19;9:21
pubmed: 20085631
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 02;11(9):e0162210
pubmed: 27588945
Malar J. 2015 Jul 22;14:282
pubmed: 26194648
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 May 12;369(1645):20130431
pubmed: 24821917
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Sep 19;10(1):432
pubmed: 28927465
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 08;8(10):e75134
pubmed: 24116029