Evolution of HIV-1 drug resistance after virological failure of first-line antiretroviral therapy in Lusaka, Zambia.
Journal
Antiviral therapy
ISSN: 2040-2058
Titre abrégé: Antivir Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815705
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
accepted:
24
02
2019
pubmed:
13
4
2019
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
13
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
HIV viral load (VL) and resistance testing are limited in sub-Saharan Africa, so individuals may have prolonged time on failing first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). Our objective was to describe the evolution of drug resistance mutations among adults failing first-line ART in Zambia. We analysed data from a trial of VL monitoring in Lusaka, Zambia. From 2006 to 2011, 12 randomized sites provided either routine VL monitoring (intervention) or discretionary (control) after ART initiation. Samples were collected prospectively following the same schedule in each arm but analysed retrospectively in the control group. For those with virological failure (VF; >400 copies/ml), HIV genotyping was performed retrospectively on baseline (BL) and on all subsequent specimens until censored due to study completion, withdrawal or death. Of 1,973 enrollees, 165 (8.4%) developed VF. 464 genotype results were available including 132 (80%) at BL, 116 (70%) at VF and 125 (76%) had at least one result between VF and censoring. Major nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations increased from 26% (BL) to 82% (VF) to 89% at last genotype (LG). M184 mutations increased from 2% to 59% to 71%; K65R from 2% to 11% to 13%; 2 or more thymidine analogue mutations from 1% to 3% to 12%. Among those on a failing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based regimen, TDF resistance increased from 42% to 58%. We found substantial resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs at VF with incremental increases after VF while still on a failing first-line ART; this resistance may compromise attainment of the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
HIV viral load (VL) and resistance testing are limited in sub-Saharan Africa, so individuals may have prolonged time on failing first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). Our objective was to describe the evolution of drug resistance mutations among adults failing first-line ART in Zambia.
METHODS
We analysed data from a trial of VL monitoring in Lusaka, Zambia. From 2006 to 2011, 12 randomized sites provided either routine VL monitoring (intervention) or discretionary (control) after ART initiation. Samples were collected prospectively following the same schedule in each arm but analysed retrospectively in the control group. For those with virological failure (VF; >400 copies/ml), HIV genotyping was performed retrospectively on baseline (BL) and on all subsequent specimens until censored due to study completion, withdrawal or death.
RESULTS
Of 1,973 enrollees, 165 (8.4%) developed VF. 464 genotype results were available including 132 (80%) at BL, 116 (70%) at VF and 125 (76%) had at least one result between VF and censoring. Major nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations increased from 26% (BL) to 82% (VF) to 89% at last genotype (LG). M184 mutations increased from 2% to 59% to 71%; K65R from 2% to 11% to 13%; 2 or more thymidine analogue mutations from 1% to 3% to 12%. Among those on a failing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based regimen, TDF resistance increased from 42% to 58%.
CONCLUSIONS
We found substantial resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs at VF with incremental increases after VF while still on a failing first-line ART; this resistance may compromise attainment of the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30977467
doi: 10.3851/IMP3299
pmc: PMC9119376
mid: NIHMS1671670
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-HIV Agents
0
RNA, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
291-300Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI027767
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : T32 AI007001
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : K24 AI120796
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U01 AI069452
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI050410
Pays : United States
Références
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Mar 22;20(1):21371
pubmed: 28630651
J Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 15;213(2):250-6
pubmed: 26175454
Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;11(10):750-9
pubmed: 21802367
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Dec 27;12:381
pubmed: 23270482
Lancet. 2013 Jun 15;381(9883):2091-9
pubmed: 23769235
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):234-47
pubmed: 25014688
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Oct;71(10):2918-27
pubmed: 27342546
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Jul;21(7):928-35
pubmed: 27125473
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;36(5):1009-21
pubmed: 17533166
J Infect Dis. 2013 Jun 15;207 Suppl 2:S70-7
pubmed: 23687292
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):605
pubmed: 28870148
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 12;5(3):e9680
pubmed: 20300631
AIDS. 2008 Oct 1;22(15):1951-60
pubmed: 18784459
Antivir Ther. 2012;17(2):377-86
pubmed: 22297391
J Med Virol. 2015 Jul;87(7):1149-57
pubmed: 25754408
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Mar;17(3):296-304
pubmed: 27914856
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Jun 1;75(2):e45-e54
pubmed: 28129253
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jul;37(7):2291-6
pubmed: 10364600
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(11):1660-9
pubmed: 22474222
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Nov 27;64(46):1287-90
pubmed: 26605986
J Infect Dis. 2017 May 1;215(9):1362-1365
pubmed: 28329236
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008 Aug;24(8):1031-5
pubmed: 18724803
Lancet HIV. 2016 Jun;3(6):e247-58
pubmed: 27240787
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(28):e3985
pubmed: 27428189
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 1;66(12):1846-1857
pubmed: 29272346
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 May;16(5):565-575
pubmed: 26831472