Effects of Various Antifouling Coatings and Fouling on Marine Sonar Performance.
acoustic sensors
antifouling coatings
fouling
transmission loss
Journal
Polymers
ISSN: 2073-4360
Titre abrégé: Polymers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Apr 2019
11 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
05
03
2019
revised:
05
04
2019
accepted:
08
04
2019
entrez:
14
4
2019
pubmed:
14
4
2019
medline:
14
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a rising imperative to increase the operational availability of maritime vessels by extending the time between full docking cycles. To achieve operational efficacy, maritime vessels must remain clear of biological growth. Such growth can cause significant increases in frictional drag, thereby reducing speed, range and fuel efficiency and decreasing the sensitivity of acoustic sensors. The impact that various stages of fouling have on acoustic equipment is unclear. It is also unclear to what extent antifouling techniques interfere with the transmission of acoustic signals. In this study, to examine this effect, neoprene samples were coated with three antifouling coatings, namely, Intersmooth 7460HS, HempaGuard X7 and Hempasil X3. Other neoprene samples were left uncoated but were imbedded with the biocide, 4,5-dichloro-2-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (DCOIT) during the mixing and curing process. Uncoated nitrile samples that had varying levels of fouling from immersion in Port Phillip Bay, Australia, for 92, 156 and 239 days were also extracted. The acoustic properties of these samples were measured using an acoustic insertion loss test and compared to uncoated neoprene or nitrile to ascertain the acoustic effects of the applications of antifouling coatings as well as the fouling growth itself. A T-peel test was performed on all coated samples in an attempt to understand the adhesive properties of the coatings when applied to neoprene. It was found that the application of antifouling coatings had little effect on the transmission characteristics of the neoprene with approximately 1 dB loss. The embedment of DCOIT, however, has a chance of causing aeration in the neoprene, which can heavily hamper transmission. An assessment of the effect of the fouling growth found that light and medium fouling levels produced little transmission loss, whereas more extreme fouling lead to a 9 dB transmission loss. The adhesion properties of the coatings were investigated but not fully ascertained as tensile yielding occurred before peeling. However, various failure modes are presented and discussed in this study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30978995
pii: polym11040663
doi: 10.3390/polym11040663
pmc: PMC6523467
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Australian Research Council
ID : Research Training Centre for Naval Design and Manufacturing (IC140100003)
Références
Nat Prod Rep. 2004 Feb;21(1):94-104
pubmed: 15039837
Biofouling. 2011 Jan;27(1):87-98
pubmed: 21161774
Nat Commun. 2011;2:244
pubmed: 21427715
Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2013 Aug;15(4):375-98
pubmed: 23525893
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1972 Feb;48(2):257-72
pubmed: 4500643