Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: prediction of cervical lymph node metastasis by dual-energy CT texture analysis with machine learning.
Artificial intelligence
Computer-assisted diagnosis
Head and neck neoplasms
Machine learning
Multidetector computed tomography
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
08
01
2019
accepted:
13
03
2019
revised:
27
02
2019
pubmed:
14
4
2019
medline:
21
1
2020
entrez:
14
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study was conducted in order to evaluate a novel risk stratification model using dual-energy CT (DECT) texture analysis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with machine learning to (1) predict associated cervical lymphadenopathy and (2) compare the accuracy of spectral versus single-energy (65 keV) texture evaluation for endpoint prediction. Eighty-seven patients with HNSCC were evaluated. Texture feature extraction was performed on virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) at 65 keV alone or different sets of multi-energy VMIs ranging from 40 to 140 keV, in addition to iodine material decomposition maps and other clinical information. Random forests (RF) models were constructed for outcome prediction with internal cross-validation in addition to the use of separate randomly selected training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined for predicting positive versus negative nodal status in the neck. Depending on the model used and subset of patients evaluated, an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of up to 88, 100, 67, 83, and 100%, respectively, could be achieved using multi-energy texture analysis. Texture evaluation of VMIs at 65 keV alone or in combination with only iodine maps had a much lower accuracy. Multi-energy DECT texture analysis of HNSCC is superior to texture analysis of 65 keV VMIs and iodine maps alone and can be used to predict cervical nodal metastases with relatively high accuracy, providing information not currently available by expert evaluation of the primary tumor alone. • Texture features of HNSCC tumor are predictive of nodal status. • Multi-energy texture analysis is superior to analysis of datasets at a single energy. • Dual-energy CT texture analysis with machine learning can enhance noninvasive diagnostic tumor evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30980127
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06159-y
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06159-y
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6172-6181Subventions
Organisme : Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
ID : NA
Organisme : Rossy Cancer Network
ID : NA
Références
Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):748-757
pubmed: 28493790
Invest Radiol. 2014 Nov;49(11):735-41
pubmed: 24872006
Clin Imaging. 2018 Mar - Apr;48:26-31
pubmed: 29028510
Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1423-9
pubmed: 26264429
Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38(4):628-34
pubmed: 25524256
Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):257-62
pubmed: 21330561
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015 Feb;15(2):207-24
pubmed: 25385488
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jun;36(6):1194-200
pubmed: 25742986
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):760-769
pubmed: 28835993
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 Sep-Oct;37(5):666-72
pubmed: 24045238
Eur Radiol. 2015 Feb;25(2):480-7
pubmed: 25216770
Cancers (Basel). 2015 Nov 06;7(4):2201-16
pubmed: 26561835
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 17;5:13087
pubmed: 26278466
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug;36(8):1518-24
pubmed: 26021623
J Digit Imaging. 2014 Dec;27(6):824-32
pubmed: 24994547
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:3973-6
pubmed: 24110602
Radiology. 2014 Jul;272(1):100-12
pubmed: 24654970
Invest Radiol. 2015 Apr;50(4):239-45
pubmed: 25501017
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Aug;44(2):445-55
pubmed: 26778191
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017 Aug;27(3):533-546
pubmed: 28711211
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):166-70
pubmed: 25258367
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017 Aug;27(3):385-400
pubmed: 28711200
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2604-2611
pubmed: 29294157
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jul 21;60(14):5471-96
pubmed: 26119045
Eur Radiol. 2015 Aug;25(8):2493-501
pubmed: 25680727
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 10;8(2):2525-2535
pubmed: 27713166
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar;206(3):580-7
pubmed: 26901015
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S161-S169
pubmed: 27841133
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Sep 1;142(9):857-65
pubmed: 27442962
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jul;36(7):1343-8
pubmed: 25836725
Nat Commun. 2014 Jun 03;5:4006
pubmed: 24892406
Acta Radiol. 2016 Jun;57(6):669-76
pubmed: 26271125
Eur Radiol. 2014 Mar;24(3):574-80
pubmed: 24081649
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Jul/Aug;41(4):565-571
pubmed: 28471869
Radiology. 2013 Dec;269(3):801-9
pubmed: 23912620
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 08;6:31020
pubmed: 27498560
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):521-9
pubmed: 26027881