Evaluation of three consecutive versions of a commercial rapid PCR test to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.


Journal

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 13 12 2018
revised: 15 03 2019
accepted: 29 03 2019
pubmed: 14 4 2019
medline: 6 2 2020
entrez: 14 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is part of many recommendations to control MRSA. Several rapid PCR tests are available commercially and updated versions are constantly released. We aimed to evaluate the performance of three consecutive versions (G3, Gen3 and NxG) of the XpertMRSA test. Routine samples for MRSA screening were simultaneously tested by culture and rapid PCR. The three versions of XpertMRSA were used successively and compared with culture. A total of 3512, 2794 and 3288 samples were analysed by culture and by the G3, Gen3 and NxG XpertMRSA versions, respectively. The rates of positive-by-culture in the three groups were 5.0%, 4.7% and 4.3%, respectively. The sensitivity improved over time (71.4, 95% CI 64.0-77.9; 82.3, 95% CI 74.4-88.2; and 84.3%, 95% CI 77.0-89.7, respectively), but not significantly. The specificity (98.4, 95% CI 97.9-98.8; 96.8, 95% CI 96.0-97.4; and 99.1, 95% CI 98.7-99.4, respectively) and the positive likelihood ratios (45.7, 95% CI 34.4-60.8; 25.6, 95% CI 20.5-32.0; and 97.1, 95% CI 66.3-142.4) were significantly lower in the Gen3 version (p < 0.00001). These significant differences in performance show the importance of evaluating each new version of a commercial test.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30980926
pii: S1198-743X(19)30150-8
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.029
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Evaluation Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1430.e1-1430.e4

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

E Bulliard (E)

Service of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

B Grandbastien (B)

Service of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

L Senn (L)

Service of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

G Greub (G)

Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

D S Blanc (DS)

Service of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Swiss National Reference Centre for Emerging Antibiotic Resistance (NARA), Fribourg, Switzerland. Electronic address: Dominique.Blanc@chuv.ch.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH