Using Collaborative Coalition Processes to Advance Community Health, Well-Being, and Equity: A Multiple-Case Study Analysis From a National Community Transformation Initiative.
community health
equity
health disparities
improvement methods
qualitative methods
Journal
Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education
ISSN: 1552-6127
Titre abrégé: Health Educ Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9704962
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
16
4
2019
medline:
15
9
2020
entrez:
16
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Spreading Community Accelerators Through Learning and Evaluation (SCALE) was a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation-funded initiative from 2015 to 2017 to build capability of 24 community coalitions to advance health, well-being, and equity. The SCALE theory of change had three components: develop leadership capability, build relationships within and between communities, and create an intercommunity system to spread promising ideas. The theory was operationalized through training academies, coaching, and peer-to-peer learning that explicitly addressed equity and systems change. In this article, we describe how SCALE facilitated community transformation related to Collaborating for Equity and Justice Principles 1, 3, 4, and 6. We conducted a multiple-case study approach with two community coalitions including site visits, interviews, and observation to illuminate underlying mechanisms of change by exploring how and why change occurs. Skid Row Women worked with women experiencing homelessness in Los Angeles to address diabetes and food systems. Healthy Livable Communities of Cattaraugus County used a portfolio of projects in order to create system changes to improve population health and increase access to services for people with disabilities in rural New York State. Through our analysis, we describe how two coalitions used SCALE tools for collaborative coalition processes such as aim setting, relationship building, and shared decision making with community residents. Our findings suggest that advancing Collaborating for Equity and Justice principles requires self-reflection and courage; new ways of being in relationship; learning from failure; productive conflict to explicitly address power, racism, and other forms of oppression; and methods to test systems improvement ideas.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30982339
doi: 10.1177/1090198119838833
pmc: PMC6759367
mid: NIHMS1037405
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100S-109SSubventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : T32 DA039772
Pays : United States
Références
Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1410-9
pubmed: 21680923
Health Educ Behav. 2015 Oct;42(5):654-68
pubmed: 25810470
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):290-8
pubmed: 24025320
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Apr;7(2 Suppl):23S-33S
pubmed: 16636153
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:369-402
pubmed: 10884958
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Oct;58:199-207
pubmed: 27454882
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 May;26(2 Suppl):146-63
pubmed: 25981095
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Feb;27(1):49-91
pubmed: 11942419
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1424-8
pubmed: 27503967
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;(6):CD009905
pubmed: 26075988
J Community Psychol. 2015 Apr;43(4):484-501
pubmed: 26668443
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jan;37(1):30-37
pubmed: 29309220
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):1959-1963
pubmed: 27834233
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Nov;7(6):A118
pubmed: 20950525
Am J Public Health. 2010 May;100(5):904-12
pubmed: 20299641