Investigating attitudes towards oocyte donation amongst potential donors and the general population: a systematic review.


Journal

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)
ISSN: 1742-8149
Titre abrégé: Hum Fertil (Camb)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100888143

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 16 4 2019
medline: 18 1 2022
entrez: 16 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

With a current shortage of oocyte donors in the United Kingdom (UK), the psychological factors determining intentions to donate oocytes are important to understand. The objectives of this review were to explore psychosocial aspects of potential oocyte donors, including attitudes, motivations, as well as any issues surrounding potential donor disclosure and anonymity. A systematic search of English peer-reviewed journals of three computerized databases following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Only English language peer-reviewed studies that have examined the psychosocial aspects of oocyte donation (OD) amongst potential oocyte donors were included. No time restriction was set for date of publication. A total of 39 studies were included which were analysed using thematic analysis. Broadly, authors have reported positive attitudes towards OD, however, knowledge surrounding OD within the general population is poor. Three key themes were identified as influencing the decision to donate: (i) altruism; (ii) financial motivation; and (iii) experience of fertility problems through friends. There were distinct differences in motivations to donate amongst potential donors according to demographics including fertility status, parity, ethnicity and religious background. Attitudes towards disclosure and anonymity appear complex. This is the first systematic review to examine potential oocyte donors exclusively and provides progressive information on the psychosocial complexities which may influence the crucial decision to donate. An increased number of well-designed studies exploring the psychological factors affecting the donation decision could allow more directed assessment and counselling for potential oocyte donors, which may lead to an increase in donor recruitment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30982353
doi: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1602736
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

169-181

Auteurs

Sophie Platts (S)

Imperial College Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.

Timothy Bracewell-Milnes (T)

Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Srdjan Saso (S)

Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Benjamin Jones (B)

Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Riya Parikh (R)

St Olave's Grammar School, Orpington, UK.

Meen-Yau Thum (MY)

Lister Hospital, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH