The influence of different shades and brands of resin-based luting agents on the final color of leucite-reinforced veneering ceramic.
Ceramic veneer
Color difference
Resin shade
Journal
The Saudi dental journal
ISSN: 1013-9052
Titre abrégé: Saudi Dent J
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 9313603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
19
10
2018
revised:
25
02
2019
accepted:
28
02
2019
entrez:
16
4
2019
pubmed:
16
4
2019
medline:
16
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different shades and brands of resin-based luting agents on the final color of a leucite-reinforced veneering ceramic. This in-vitro study was done on 36 ceramic discs (IPS Empress I, 11 × 0.5 mm, A2 shade) and 36 cement disks (11 × 0.2 mm) made of Panavia SA Cement Plus (Kuraray Medical Inc.) and Choice2 (Bisco Inc., Schumburg) brands in translucent, universal A2, and opaque shades (n = 6 per each color in each resin cement brand). Color parameters (CIEL Both the resin-based luting agent shade (P < 0.001) and brand (P = 0.023) significantly affected the color differences. ΔE values were significantly different between Panavia-opaque and Choice2-opaque (P < 0.001). No significant difference existed between ΔE of the two brands in A2 (P = 0.178) and translucent shades (P = 0.079). The ΔE values of Panavia-A2 was significantly different from the translucent and opaque shades of the same brand. Moreover, the ΔE of Choice2-translucent shade was significantly lower than that of A2 and opaque shades. The ΔE values were higher than the clinically-acceptable threshold in all groups (ΔE > 3.7) except for Choice2-translucent (ΔE = 3.37). The final color of leucite-reinforced veneering ceramic can be affected by the same shades of resin-based luting agents from different brands and different shades of resin-based luting agents from the same brand.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30983841
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.045
pii: S1013-9052(18)30606-0
pmc: PMC6445440
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
284-289Références
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Mar;81(3):327-34
pubmed: 10050122
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Apr;83(4):412-7
pubmed: 10756290
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jul;88(1):10-5
pubmed: 12239473
Adv Dent Res. 2003 Dec;17:55-60
pubmed: 15126208
J Dent. 2005 Jan;33(1):3-8
pubmed: 15652162
Dent Mater. 2005 Aug;21(8):721-30
pubmed: 15885764
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Dec;96(6):397-401
pubmed: 17174656
Dent Mater. 2008 Jun;24(6):804-13
pubmed: 18006051
J Dent. 2008 Mar;36(3):219-23
pubmed: 18241969
Br Dent J. 2008 Mar 22;204(6):E11
pubmed: 18297048
Dent Mater. 2008 Sep;24(9):1243-7
pubmed: 18343494
Oper Dent. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):386-91
pubmed: 18666495
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2010 Mar;38(3):179-86
pubmed: 20369450
J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e87-94
pubmed: 20472022
Eur J Dent. 2011 Jul;5(3):245-52
pubmed: 21769264
J Dent. 2013 Feb;41(2):97-105
pubmed: 22521701
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Mar;109(3):179-86
pubmed: 23522367
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1570-8
pubmed: 23627846
J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):1043-50
pubmed: 24004966
J Dent. 2014 Jun;42(6):637-44
pubmed: 24334221
J Prosthodont Res. 2015 Jul;59(3):172-7
pubmed: 25840891
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Aug;114(2):272-7
pubmed: 25882974
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Sep;114(3):398-402
pubmed: 26047806
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016 Sep;28(5):295-303
pubmed: 26876053
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Apr;117(4):539-544
pubmed: 27765394
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Nov;118(5):611-616
pubmed: 28385444
Materials (Basel). 2018 Mar 22;11(4):null
pubmed: 29565827
Dent Mater. 2018 Nov;34(11):1610-1624
pubmed: 30213524
Dent Mater. 1987 Oct;3(5):246-51
pubmed: 3479360
J Esthet Dent. 1997;9(4):197-207
pubmed: 9468884
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Mar;79(3):254-60
pubmed: 9553875