Comparative study of risk indicators associated with tooth loss among adult population in urban and rural areas of Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Edentulous
Ghaziabad
elderly
oral health knowledge
risk indicator
tooth loss
Journal
Journal of family medicine and primary care
ISSN: 2249-4863
Titre abrégé: J Family Med Prim Care
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101610082
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
entrez:
16
4
2019
pubmed:
16
4
2019
medline:
16
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Oral health objectives prescribed by World Health Organization for the year 2020 have expressed that there ought to be an expansion in the quantity of people with functional dentitions (at least 21 common teeth) at ages of 35-44 and 65-74 years. The aim of this study is to examine the prevalence of tooth loss and to evaluate and compare the risk indicators associated with tooth loss among adult population in urban and rural areas of Muradnagar, Ghaziabad. A cross-sectional study was led among 1200 adults aged 35-74 years in urban and rural areas of Muradnagar, India. Information was assembled by an interview followed by clinical examination (number of missing teeth). Demographic and socioeconomic factors and self-perceived oral health were the independent variables assessed. One-way analysis of variance, post-hoc test (Bonferroni), Chi-square test, Student's Low educational status, no dental check-ups, low frequency of brushing, older age, and smoking habit were independent risk factors for tooth loss. The odds of tooth loss in older adults and illiterates were higher; the odds for tooth loss among those who expressed their desire for replacement of missing teeth were 1.3 times lower than their counterparts. The experiences gained up showed that tooth loss was very pervasive in Muradnagar populace and the critical hazard indicators identified were age, education, socioeconomic status, and cigarette smoking.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Oral health objectives prescribed by World Health Organization for the year 2020 have expressed that there ought to be an expansion in the quantity of people with functional dentitions (at least 21 common teeth) at ages of 35-44 and 65-74 years.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to examine the prevalence of tooth loss and to evaluate and compare the risk indicators associated with tooth loss among adult population in urban and rural areas of Muradnagar, Ghaziabad.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was led among 1200 adults aged 35-74 years in urban and rural areas of Muradnagar, India. Information was assembled by an interview followed by clinical examination (number of missing teeth). Demographic and socioeconomic factors and self-perceived oral health were the independent variables assessed. One-way analysis of variance, post-hoc test (Bonferroni), Chi-square test, Student's
RESULTS
RESULTS
Low educational status, no dental check-ups, low frequency of brushing, older age, and smoking habit were independent risk factors for tooth loss. The odds of tooth loss in older adults and illiterates were higher; the odds for tooth loss among those who expressed their desire for replacement of missing teeth were 1.3 times lower than their counterparts.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The experiences gained up showed that tooth loss was very pervasive in Muradnagar populace and the critical hazard indicators identified were age, education, socioeconomic status, and cigarette smoking.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30984667
doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_409_18
pii: JFMPC-8-528
pmc: PMC6436253
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
528-534Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;30(1):29-37
pubmed: 11918573
Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Dec;110(6):417-24
pubmed: 12507214
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;31(6):403-11
pubmed: 14986907
BMC Oral Health. 2006 Mar 15;6:5
pubmed: 16536880
J Public Health Dent. 2006 Spring;66(2):110-5
pubmed: 16711630
Med Princ Pract. 2006;15(6):417-22
pubmed: 17047347
Int Dent J. 2008 Apr;58(2):103-8
pubmed: 18478892
J Prosthodont. 2009 Feb;18(2):88-96
pubmed: 19254297
J Prosthodont. 2009 Feb;18(2):112-5
pubmed: 19254300
Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(5):297-303
pubmed: 19544203
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Nov 05;8:126
pubmed: 21050499
BMC Oral Health. 2011 Feb 23;11:6
pubmed: 21342536
Braz Oral Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;26(5):390-6
pubmed: 23018226
J Oral Sci. 2012;54(4):303-12
pubmed: 23221155
J Periodontol. 2014 Mar;85(3):406-16
pubmed: 23895250
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Mar;13(1):60-4
pubmed: 24603918
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Jun;13(2):170-8
pubmed: 24984618
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1989 Oct;17(5):221-6
pubmed: 2791508
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jun;22(5):2103-2109
pubmed: 29270902
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1753-1760
pubmed: 30167794
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1984 Apr;12(2):128-35
pubmed: 6584263
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):783-9
pubmed: 8655775
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Dec;25(6):429-37
pubmed: 9429816