Exploring the Use of Species Sensitivity Distributions to Define Protective Limits for the Use of Organic Wastes as Soil Amendments.


Journal

Environmental toxicology and chemistry
ISSN: 1552-8618
Titre abrégé: Environ Toxicol Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8308958

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 01 02 2019
revised: 20 03 2019
accepted: 12 04 2019
pubmed: 16 4 2019
medline: 21 4 2020
entrez: 16 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The use of organic wastes as soil amendments can be an important measure to improve soil quality and reduce waste accumulation and landfilling. However, the potential contaminant loads of such wastes, can be a source of environmental concern. Consequently, legislation has been developed to regulate the use of these wastes in agricultural soils. However, the regulations only consider chemical parameters, which are insufficient to establish the level of environmental risk. A possible solution is the use of species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), employing ecotoxicological data from test batteries that could be incorporated into legislation. In the present study, 2 different hazardous concentrations affecting 5 and 50% of the soil community (HC5 and HC50, respectively) were determined using ecotoxicological data (effect concentrations, 10 and 50% [EC10 and EC50, respectively]) for 5 different wastes. The results demonstrate that, as expected, current legislative thresholds do not translate to environmental risk/protection and that SSDs may be an important tool allowing the simple inclusion and interpretation of ecotoxicological data from test batteries in legislation. On the other hand, SSDs must be used with caution because there are still doubts about their actual value in risk prediction and about which estimates provide adequate protection. For instance, the use of HC50

Identifiants

pubmed: 30985941
doi: 10.1002/etc.4442
doi:

Substances chimiques

Metals 0
Sewage 0
Soil Pollutants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1569-1576

Subventions

Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
ID : SFRH/BPD/110943/2015
Pays : International
Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
ID : SFRH/BPD/84140/2012
Pays : International
Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
ID : PTDC/AAC - AMB/119273/2010
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© 2019 SETAC.

Auteurs

Mathieu Renaud (M)

Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.

Sónia Chelinho (S)

Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.

Paula Alvarenga (P)

Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture, and Food Research Unit, School of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, Lisbon, Portugal.

Clarisse Mourinha (C)

Department of Applied Sciences and Technologies, Polytechnic Institute of Beja, Beja, Portugal.

Patrícia Palma (P)

Department of Applied Sciences and Technologies, Polytechnic Institute of Beja, Beja, Portugal.
Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.

José Paulo Sousa (JP)

Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.

Tiago Natal-da-Luz (T)

Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH