Perspectives and pregnancy outcomes of maternal Ramadan fasting in the second trimester of pregnancy.
Adolescent
Adult
Case-Control Studies
Diabetes, Gestational
/ etiology
Fasting
/ adverse effects
Female
Gestational Weight Gain
Humans
Infant, Low Birth Weight
Infant, Newborn
Iraq
Islam
/ psychology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy Trimester, Second
/ psychology
Premature Birth
/ etiology
Young Adult
Fasting
Gestational diabetes
Pregnancy
Ramadan
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Apr 2019
15 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
30
01
2019
accepted:
31
03
2019
entrez:
17
4
2019
pubmed:
17
4
2019
medline:
7
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There are controversies over the effects of Ramadan fasting on pregnancy outcomes, and women's perspectives of fasting are diverse. This study aimed to assess the perspectives and pregnancy outcomes of maternal Ramadan fasting in the second trimester of pregnancy. A case-control study was conducted at Hawler Maternity Teaching Hospital of Erbil, Iraq from October 2017 to January 2018. Out of 301 participating women, 155 fasted during the second trimester of their current pregnancy, while the remaining 146 did not. Mothers were asked concerning their fasting behaviors and perception of fasting during pregnancy. The main outcomes of this study were gestational diabetes, preterm labour, preeclampsia, low birth weight, Apgar score, height, weight, and head circumference of the newborn. About 80% of the women in the fasting group fasted for 21-29 days during Ramadan, out of whom 38.7% completed fasting for the entire Ramadan period. The results revealed that the decision to fast during pregnancy was negatively associated with the mother's educational level and occupation. Weight gain during pregnancy in the fasting women was approximately 0.4 kg less than those who did not fast. The incidence of gestational diabetes was 2.6% in the fasting women, while it was 8.3% in the non-fasting mothers (P = 0.02). Regression analysis showed that women who did not fast during the second trimester of pregnancy were 1.51 times more likely to develop gestational diabetes [odd ratio (OR) 1.51; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.06, 0.74, P = 0.01]. It was also found that among the women in the fasting categories, those who fasted for 21-29 days during pregnancy had a lower risk of gestational diabetes compared to the other groups. More than half of the mothers in the fasting group (60%) perceived that fasting during pregnancy was compulsory for healthy and non-healthy women, comparing with those who did not fast. It was found that fasting during the second trimester of the pregnancy decreased the risk of gestational diabetes and excessive weight gain during pregnancy. Most of Iraqi women did not fully recognize their right to be exempted from fasting during pregnancy by the Islamic law.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There are controversies over the effects of Ramadan fasting on pregnancy outcomes, and women's perspectives of fasting are diverse. This study aimed to assess the perspectives and pregnancy outcomes of maternal Ramadan fasting in the second trimester of pregnancy.
METHODS
METHODS
A case-control study was conducted at Hawler Maternity Teaching Hospital of Erbil, Iraq from October 2017 to January 2018. Out of 301 participating women, 155 fasted during the second trimester of their current pregnancy, while the remaining 146 did not. Mothers were asked concerning their fasting behaviors and perception of fasting during pregnancy. The main outcomes of this study were gestational diabetes, preterm labour, preeclampsia, low birth weight, Apgar score, height, weight, and head circumference of the newborn.
RESULTS
RESULTS
About 80% of the women in the fasting group fasted for 21-29 days during Ramadan, out of whom 38.7% completed fasting for the entire Ramadan period. The results revealed that the decision to fast during pregnancy was negatively associated with the mother's educational level and occupation. Weight gain during pregnancy in the fasting women was approximately 0.4 kg less than those who did not fast. The incidence of gestational diabetes was 2.6% in the fasting women, while it was 8.3% in the non-fasting mothers (P = 0.02). Regression analysis showed that women who did not fast during the second trimester of pregnancy were 1.51 times more likely to develop gestational diabetes [odd ratio (OR) 1.51; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.06, 0.74, P = 0.01]. It was also found that among the women in the fasting categories, those who fasted for 21-29 days during pregnancy had a lower risk of gestational diabetes compared to the other groups. More than half of the mothers in the fasting group (60%) perceived that fasting during pregnancy was compulsory for healthy and non-healthy women, comparing with those who did not fast.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
It was found that fasting during the second trimester of the pregnancy decreased the risk of gestational diabetes and excessive weight gain during pregnancy. Most of Iraqi women did not fully recognize their right to be exempted from fasting during pregnancy by the Islamic law.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30987614
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2275-x
pii: 10.1186/s12884-019-2275-x
pmc: PMC6466666
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
128Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Dec;21(4):189-91
pubmed: 11191165
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;98(4):709-16
pubmed: 11592272
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1992 Jun;32(2):156-63
pubmed: 1434584
J Perinatol. 2005 Feb;25(2):90-2
pubmed: 15526011
Singapore Med J. 2004 Dec;45(12):583-6
pubmed: 15568120
J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2005 Apr;37(2):83-90
pubmed: 15906153
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Sep;24(6):635-7
pubmed: 16147601
J Indian Med Assoc. 2005 May;103(5):259-62, 266
pubmed: 16229330
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 17;47(2):398-402
pubmed: 16412867
Am J Perinatol. 2006 Jan;23(1):21-4
pubmed: 16450268
JAMA. 2006 Apr 5;295(13):1539-48
pubmed: 16595757
Ann Saudi Med. 2002 May-Jul;22(3-4):186-91
pubmed: 17159392
Singapore Med J. 2007 Oct;48(10):906-10
pubmed: 17909674
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):597-604
pubmed: 20177292
Am J Hum Biol. 2011 Sep-Oct;23(5):651-4
pubmed: 21630372
J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;30(6):1246-60
pubmed: 21930320
Arch Dis Child. 1990 Oct;65(10 Spec No):1053-6
pubmed: 2241226
J Sports Sci. 2012;30 Suppl 1:S9-19
pubmed: 22742901
BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1379-86
pubmed: 22827751
Iran J Pediatr. 2010 Jun;20(2):181-6
pubmed: 23056701
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Apr 15;177(8):729-36
pubmed: 23486307
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012 Nov;17(7):467-71
pubmed: 23922591
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1122-31
pubmed: 24150027
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jun 24;7:392
pubmed: 24962444
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Sep 26;14:335
pubmed: 25261183
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2016 Dec;6(4):267-275
pubmed: 28065259
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Dec 4;5(1):e000470
pubmed: 29299329
Hum Nutr Appl Nutr. 1987 Feb;41(1):47-50
pubmed: 3558007
Lancet. 1982 Mar 13;1(8272):588-92
pubmed: 6121184
Br J Nutr. 1978 Nov;40(3):573-81
pubmed: 718840