Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children and Pregnant Women: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.


Journal

JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 04 2019
Historique:
entrez: 17 4 2019
pubmed: 17 4 2019
medline: 25 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Elevated blood lead levels in children are associated with neurologic effects such as behavioral and learning problems, lower IQ, hyperactivity, hearing problems, and impaired growth. In pregnant women, lead exposure can impair organ systems such as the hematopoietic, hepatic, renal, and nervous systems, and increase the risk of preeclampsia and adverse perinatal outcomes. Many of the adverse health effects of lead exposure are irreversible. To update the 2006 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for elevated blood lead levels in children and pregnant women. The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for and treatment of elevated blood lead levels. In this update, an elevated blood lead level was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reference level of 5 μg/dL. The USPSTF found adequate evidence that questionnaires and other clinical prediction tools to identify asymptomatic children with elevated blood lead levels are inaccurate. The USPSTF found adequate evidence that capillary blood testing accurately identifies children with elevated blood lead levels. The USPSTF found inadequate evidence on the effectiveness of treatment of elevated blood lead levels in asymptomatic children 5 years and younger and in pregnant women. The USPSTF found inadequate evidence regarding the accuracy of questionnaires and other clinical prediction tools to identify asymptomatic pregnant women with elevated blood lead levels. The USPSTF found inadequate evidence on the harms of screening for or treatment of elevated blood lead levels in asymptomatic children and pregnant women. The USPSTF concluded that the current evidence is insufficient, and that the balance of benefits and harms of screening for elevated blood lead levels in asymptomatic children 5 years and younger and in pregnant women cannot be determined. The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for elevated blood lead levels in asymptomatic children. (I statement) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for elevated blood lead levels in asymptomatic pregnant persons. (I statement).

Identifiants

pubmed: 30990556
pii: 2730621
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3326
doi:

Substances chimiques

Lead 2P299V784P

Types de publication

Journal Article Practice Guideline Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1502-1509

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Susan J Curry (SJ)

University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Alex H Krist (AH)

Fairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia.
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

Douglas K Owens (DK)

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Michael J Barry (MJ)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Michael Cabana (M)

University of California, San Francisco.

Aaron B Caughey (AB)

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Chyke A Doubeni (CA)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

John W Epling (JW)

Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke.

Alex R Kemper (AR)

Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.

Martha Kubik (M)

Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

C Seth Landefeld (CS)

University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Carol M Mangione (CM)

University of California, Los Angeles.

Lori Pbert (L)

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.

Michael Silverstein (M)

Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Melissa A Simon (MA)

Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

Chien-Wen Tseng (CW)

University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Pacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii.

John B Wong (JB)

Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH