Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization.
Journal
Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)
ISSN: 1806-9282
Titre abrégé: Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 9308586
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
15
07
2018
accepted:
05
08
2018
entrez:
18
4
2019
pubmed:
18
4
2019
medline:
2
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on improved prognosis and relief of symptoms. National and international guidelines on CAD support the indication of revascularization in patients with limiting symptoms and refractory to optimal medical treatment, as well as in clinical situations where there is a prognostic benefit of interventional treatment. Most of the studies that support the guidelines for indication of revascularization date back to the 1980s and1990s of the last century. Recent studies have revisited the theme and brought a new breath. The present review provides a critical analysis of classic indications for revascularization, reviewing evidence from the studies of the 1970s to the recent controversial ORBITA study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30994826
pii: S0104-42302019000300319
doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.319
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01471522']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM