An assessment of climate change vulnerability for Important Bird Areas in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Arc.
Alaska
Algorithms
Animal Nutrition Sciences
Animals
Biomass
Birds
/ physiology
Charadriiformes
/ physiology
Climate
Climate Change
Cluster Analysis
Conservation of Natural Resources
Ecosystem
Fishes
Geography
Ice Cover
Models, Theoretical
Population Dynamics
Reproducibility of Results
Seawater
Species Specificity
Temperature
Time Factors
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
04
2018
accepted:
15
03
2019
entrez:
18
4
2019
pubmed:
18
4
2019
medline:
28
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recently available downscaled ocean climate models for the Bering Sea and Aleutian Arc offer the opportunity to assess climate vulnerability for upper trophic level consumers such as marine birds. We analyzed seasonal and annual spatial projections from three climate models for two physical climate variables (seawater temperature and sea ice) and three forage variables (large copepods, euphausiids, and benthic infauna), comparing projected conditions from a recent time period (2003-2012) to a future time period (2030-2039). We focused the analyses on core areas within globally significant Important Bird Areas, and developed indices of the magnitude of projected change and vulnerability agreement among models. All three climate models indicated a high degree of change for seawater temperature warming (highest in the central and eastern Aleutian Islands) and ice loss (most significant in the eastern Bering Sea) across scales, and we found those changes to be significant for every species and virtually every core area assessed. There was low model agreement for the forage variables; while the majority of core areas were identified as climate vulnerable by one or more models (72% for large copepods, 73% for euphausiids, and 94% for benthic infauna), very few were agreed upon by all three models (only 6% of euphausiid-forager core areas). Based on the magnitude-agreement score, euphausiid biomass decline affected core areas for fulmars, gulls, and auklets, especially along the outer shelf and Aleutian Islands. Benthic biomass decline affected eiders along the inner shelf, and large copepod decline was significant for storm-petrels and auklets in the western Aleutians. Overall, 12% of core areas indicated climate vulnerability for all variables assessed. Modeling and interpreting biological parameters to project future dynamics remains complex; the strong signal for projected physical changes raised concerns about lagged responses such as distribution shifts, breeding failures, mortality events, and population declines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30995250
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214573
pii: PONE-D-18-12017
pmc: PMC6469780
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0214573Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: Axiom Data Science. (W.C. Koeppen) This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Ecol Appl. 2009 Sep;19(6):1596-613
pubmed: 19769106
Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2012;4:63-78
pubmed: 22457969
Biol Lett. 2016 Sep;12(9):
pubmed: 27651532
Ecol Appl. 2008 Mar;18(2):309-20
pubmed: 18488598
Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95
pubmed: 11919621
Mar Pollut Bull. 2015 Dec 15;101(1):127-136
pubmed: 26602441
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 02;10(9):e0135350
pubmed: 26333202
J Anim Ecol. 2009 Mar;78(2):460-7
pubmed: 19021778
Science. 2010 Jun 18;328(5985):1523-8
pubmed: 20558709
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):132-142
pubmed: 28850764
Ecol Appl. 2014 Mar;24(2):396-412
pubmed: 24689150
Science. 2006 Mar 10;311(5766):1461-4
pubmed: 16527980
Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):752-5
pubmed: 17151666
Science. 2011 Dec 23;334(6063):1703-6
pubmed: 22194577
PeerJ. 2018 Mar 22;6:e4519
pubmed: 29593940