Retrospective analysis of iatrogenic diseases in cattle requiring admission to a veterinary hospital.
cattle
iatrogenic disease
malpractice
medical rrror
Journal
Veterinary record open
ISSN: 2052-6113
Titre abrégé: Vet Rec Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101653671
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
12
09
2017
revised:
23
11
2018
accepted:
21
01
2019
entrez:
19
4
2019
pubmed:
19
4
2019
medline:
19
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Iatrogenic diseases in veterinary medicine are often related to malpractice or lack of skill. For this retrospective study, 4262 clinical records of cattle admitted to the veterinary teaching hospital of the University of Milan between 2005 and 2017 were analysed, and 121 cases (2.8 per cent), referred for an iatrogenic-related disease, were selected. The findings showed that iatrogenic diseases were more often caused by farmers (92.6per cent) than by bovine practitioners (7.4 per cent). Iatrogenic diseases were caused mainly by the improper administration of drugs (43.0 per cent), forced extraction during calving (19.8 per cent), forced milk or colostrum feeding, which was often performed by awkward administration using a nipple bottle (14.9 per cent) or by oral oesophageal tubing (15.7 per cent). Moreover, farmers often performed medical, nursing and zootechnical procedures without adequate training. The role of the practitioner is fundamental in farmer education. Clinicians, especially in some professional branches such as neonatology, should not delegate medical procedures to untrained farmers. Effective tutoring and good communication with farmers play a key role in dairy herd health and consequently in public health. This then can lead to a decrease in improper drug administration, the prevention of antibiotic resistance and the reduction of treatment costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30997111
doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2017-000254
pii: vetreco-2017-000254
pmc: PMC6446213
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000254Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):774-7
pubmed: 10720365
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Apr;85(4):992-1001
pubmed: 12018446
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2003 May 30;115(10):318-25
pubmed: 12800445
Clin Biochem. 2004 Dec;37(12):1043-51
pubmed: 15589809
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Aug;88(8):2991-9
pubmed: 16027213
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991 Feb 1;198(3):419-22
pubmed: 1901305
Vet Surg. 2008 Dec;37(8):801-8
pubmed: 19121177
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009 Mar;25(1):121-37, vi-vii
pubmed: 19174286
Prev Vet Med. 2009 May 1;89(1-2):128-33
pubmed: 19303152
N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):370-6
pubmed: 1987460
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1296-306
pubmed: 20172249
Ir Vet J. 2008 Oct 01;61(10):668-76
pubmed: 21851703
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Mar 1;103(4):248-56
pubmed: 21958900
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 Nov 1;197(9):1196-202
pubmed: 2254152
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012 Jul;28(2):363-79
pubmed: 22664213
Vet Rec. 2012 Oct 20;171(16):401
pubmed: 22952132
Rev Sci Tech. 2012 Aug;31(2):519-31
pubmed: 23413731
Vet Rec. 2013 Jun 29;172(26):685
pubmed: 23677645
Vet J. 2013 Oct;198(1):224-8
pubmed: 23938003
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014 May;41(3):243-8
pubmed: 24571418
Res Vet Sci. 2015 Apr;99:60-2
pubmed: 25744431
Zoonoses Public Health. 2015 Apr;62 Suppl 1:29-38
pubmed: 25903493
Vet Rec. 2015 Oct 31;177(17):438
pubmed: 26489997
Vet Rec. 2015 Nov 14;177(19):492
pubmed: 26494771
Vet Rec. 2015 Oct 31;177(17):436-7
pubmed: 26515351
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2016 Nov;32(3):797-811
pubmed: 27614774
Vet Rec. 2017 Mar 25;180(12):305
pubmed: 28275092
Vet Rec. 2018 Feb 3;182(5):140
pubmed: 29097603
Vet J. 2017 Oct;228:38-40
pubmed: 29153106
Vet Rec. 1993 Nov 27;133(22):555
pubmed: 8116164