Setting the international standard for longitudinal follow-up of patients with systemic sclerosis: a Delphi-based expert consensus on core clinical features.
autoimmune diseases
multidisciplinary team-care
qualitative research
systemic sclerosis
Journal
RMD open
ISSN: 2056-5933
Titre abrégé: RMD Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101662038
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
25
09
2018
revised:
28
11
2018
accepted:
17
12
2018
entrez:
19
4
2019
pubmed:
19
4
2019
medline:
19
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe, progressive multiorgan disease but to date, there are no established standardised international guidelines for follow-up of patients with SSc. The goal of this project was to develop an expert consensus for annual systematic investigations in patients with SSc to enhance their standard-of-care. The Delphi method was applied. All SSc experts from the European Scleroderma Trials and Research group network and the Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium were invited to participate. All experts were asked to answer questionnaires in five Delphi steps to determine the domains of interest and tools for each domain for an annual systematic assessment of patients with SSc. Each item was rated on a scale between 0% and 100% (not and very important), and parameters rated >80% by more than 75% of the experts were regarded as acceptable. In total, 157 experts worldwide participated with 71.3% experts seeing >50 patients with SSc annually. In the first round, 23 domains and 204 tools were suggested. After five Delphi steps, experts agreed on 10 domains including (1) Raynaud's phenomenon; (2) Digital ulcers; (3) Skin and mucosa; (4) Lung; (5); Heart; (6) GI domain, (7) Renal; (8) Musculoskeletal; (9) Laboratory and (10) Treatment. Overall, 55 tools were identified including clinical assessments, laboratory measurements and imaging or functional investigations. Through five Delphi steps with world leading experts, a consensus was established on strongly suggested tools for a minimum annual systemic assessment of organ involvement in SSc. This work should enhance the standardisation and homogenisation of the practices.
Sections du résumé
Background
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe, progressive multiorgan disease but to date, there are no established standardised international guidelines for follow-up of patients with SSc. The goal of this project was to develop an expert consensus for annual systematic investigations in patients with SSc to enhance their standard-of-care.
Material and methods
The Delphi method was applied. All SSc experts from the European Scleroderma Trials and Research group network and the Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium were invited to participate. All experts were asked to answer questionnaires in five Delphi steps to determine the domains of interest and tools for each domain for an annual systematic assessment of patients with SSc. Each item was rated on a scale between 0% and 100% (not and very important), and parameters rated >80% by more than 75% of the experts were regarded as acceptable.
Results
In total, 157 experts worldwide participated with 71.3% experts seeing >50 patients with SSc annually. In the first round, 23 domains and 204 tools were suggested. After five Delphi steps, experts agreed on 10 domains including (1) Raynaud's phenomenon; (2) Digital ulcers; (3) Skin and mucosa; (4) Lung; (5); Heart; (6) GI domain, (7) Renal; (8) Musculoskeletal; (9) Laboratory and (10) Treatment. Overall, 55 tools were identified including clinical assessments, laboratory measurements and imaging or functional investigations.
Conclusion
Through five Delphi steps with world leading experts, a consensus was established on strongly suggested tools for a minimum annual systemic assessment of organ involvement in SSc. This work should enhance the standardisation and homogenisation of the practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30997150
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000826
pii: rmdopen-2018-000826
pmc: PMC6446182
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000826Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: A-MH-V has obtained research support from Boehringer Ingelheim. She is a scientific consultant for Actelion and Boehringer Ingelheim in the field of systemic sclerosis and related diseases. She has received travel expenses from GSK, Actelion and Boehringer Ingelheim. OD has obtained research support from Bayer, Sanofi, Ergonex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion and Pfizer. He is a scientific consultant for 4 D Science, Actelion, Active Biotec, Bayer, BiogenIdec, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemoAb, EpiPharm, Ergonex, espeRare foundation, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Inventiva, Lilly, medac, MedImmune, Pharmacyclics, Pfizer, Serodapharm and Sinoxa in the field of systemic sclerosis and related diseases and has a patent licensed on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. OK-B received consultancies, honoraria and/or speaker fees from Abbvie, Actelion, Bayer, Roche. DK has received consulting fees from Actelion, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cytori, CSL Behring, Corbus, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Inventiva, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB and has stock options with Eicos Sciences, Inc. YA has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in relationship with the treatment of systemic sclerosis from Actelion, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/ Roche, Inventiva, Medac, Pfizer, Sanofi/Genzyme, Servier and UCB.
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Oct;69(10):1809-15
pubmed: 20551155
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 1;37(1):67-119
pubmed: 26320113
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 Apr 23;1:15002
pubmed: 27189141
Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1685-1699
pubmed: 28413064
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0174329
pubmed: 28319201
Front Immunol. 2015 Jun 08;6:272
pubmed: 26106387
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Jan 30;20(1):17
pubmed: 29382380
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18
pubmed: 28516167
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Mar 1;57(3):441-450
pubmed: 28499034
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov;76(11):1897-1905
pubmed: 28835464
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug;71(8):1355-60
pubmed: 22615460
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jul;66(7):940-4
pubmed: 17329309
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Nov;72(11):1747-55
pubmed: 24092682
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35 Suppl 106(4):75-81
pubmed: 28664834
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jun 15;59(6):867-75
pubmed: 18512721
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Nov;63(11):3522-30
pubmed: 21769843
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0163894
pubmed: 27706206
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Aug;46(1):115-23
pubmed: 27132536
Arthritis Rheum. 1980 May;23(5):581-90
pubmed: 7378088
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Aug;76(8):1327-1339
pubmed: 27941129
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Dec;65(12):3194-201
pubmed: 24022584