The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions.
RFID
Social interaction
Social network
Social sensor
Validity
Journal
Behavior research methods
ISSN: 1554-3528
Titre abrégé: Behav Res Methods
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101244316
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
19
4
2019
medline:
28
1
2020
entrez:
19
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Face-to-face interactions are important for a variety of individual behaviors and outcomes. In recent years, a number of human sensor technologies have been proposed to incorporate direct observations in behavioral studies of face-to-face interactions. One of the most promising emerging technologies is the application of active Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) badges. They are increasingly applied in behavioral studies because of their low costs, straightforward applicability, and moderate ethical concerns. However, despite the attention that RFID badges have recently received, there is a lack of systematic tests on how valid RFID badges are in measuring face-to-face interactions. With two studies, we aim to fill this gap. Study 1 (N = 11) compares how data assessed with RFID badges correspond with video data of the same interactions (construct validity) and how this fit can be improved using straightforward data processing strategies. The analyses show that the RFID badges have a sensitivity of 50%, which can be enhanced to 65% when flickering signals with gaps of less than 75 s are interpolated. The specificity is relatively less affected by this interpolation process (before interpolation 97%, after interpolation 94.7%)-resulting in an improved accuracy of the measurement. In Study 2 (N = 73) we show that self-report data of social interactions correspond highly with data gathered with the RFID badges (criterion validity).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30997659
doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y
pii: 10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y
pmc: PMC6797650
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2120-2138Références
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;125:40-50
pubmed: 24797692
Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):844-72
pubmed: 11107879
J Couns Psychol. 2009 Apr;56(2):289-300
pubmed: 20428460
Alcohol Res Health. 2010;33(1-2):127-43
pubmed: 23579943
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):458-67
pubmed: 11564849
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;6(2):114-33
pubmed: 21660127
J Theor Biol. 2011 Feb 21;271(1):166-80
pubmed: 21130777
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):396-403
pubmed: 26151975
Emotion. 2017 Dec;17(8):1166-1180
pubmed: 28358560
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 15;5(7):e11596
pubmed: 20657651
Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34
pubmed: 22833776
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 May;7(3):221-37
pubmed: 26168460
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jul;65(1):45-55
pubmed: 8355141
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 29;10(1):1444
pubmed: 31996728
Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529
pubmed: 7777651
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e17144
pubmed: 21386902
Am J Epidemiol. 1985 May;121(5):744-53
pubmed: 4014166
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 22;16:341
pubmed: 27449511