DireCt Lung Ultrasound Evaluation (CLUE): A novel technique for monitoring extravascular lung water in donor lungs.
ex-vivo lung perfusion
extravascular lung water
lung transplantation
lung ultrasound
pulmonary edema
Journal
The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation
ISSN: 1557-3117
Titre abrégé: J Heart Lung Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9102703
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
09
10
2018
revised:
24
01
2019
accepted:
08
03
2019
pubmed:
20
4
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
20
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Extravascular lung water (EVLW) could change in donor lungs in a time-dependent fashion during procurement or ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and may vary across different zones. Current techniques for EVLW assessment are either subjective, general estimation, or not feasible in the clinical setting. An accurate and non-invasive diagnostic tool for EVLW would be desirable for donor lung assessment and management. Therefore, we studied the feasibility and accuracy of direCt Lung Ultrasound Evaluation (CLUE) technique. Eleven lungs were utilized for the human model and 6 lungs for the porcine model. Lungs underwent EVLP for 2 hours. In CLUE, ultrasound images were taken directly from the lungs. A scoring system was created for each point based on the percentage of B-lines. Images were graded according to the degree of edema. An equation was used to calculate total lung and lobe scores based on number of images of each grade. CLUE point score correlated with wet/dry ratio in human and porcine models (n = 99, r = 0.863, p < 0.001; and n = 31, r = 0.916, p < 0.001, respectively). CLUE total lung score correlated with lung weight (n = 19, r = 0.812, p < 0.001; and n = 12, r = 0.895, p < 0.001, respectively). CLUE lobe score correlated negatively with partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in the human model (n = 20, r = -0.775, p < 0.001). EVLW monitoring in donor lungs with CLUE after procurement is feasible and CLUE scores were found to be significantly correlated with lung weight, wet/dry, and PaO
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Extravascular lung water (EVLW) could change in donor lungs in a time-dependent fashion during procurement or ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and may vary across different zones. Current techniques for EVLW assessment are either subjective, general estimation, or not feasible in the clinical setting. An accurate and non-invasive diagnostic tool for EVLW would be desirable for donor lung assessment and management. Therefore, we studied the feasibility and accuracy of direCt Lung Ultrasound Evaluation (CLUE) technique.
METHODS
Eleven lungs were utilized for the human model and 6 lungs for the porcine model. Lungs underwent EVLP for 2 hours. In CLUE, ultrasound images were taken directly from the lungs. A scoring system was created for each point based on the percentage of B-lines. Images were graded according to the degree of edema. An equation was used to calculate total lung and lobe scores based on number of images of each grade.
RESULTS
CLUE point score correlated with wet/dry ratio in human and porcine models (n = 99, r = 0.863, p < 0.001; and n = 31, r = 0.916, p < 0.001, respectively). CLUE total lung score correlated with lung weight (n = 19, r = 0.812, p < 0.001; and n = 12, r = 0.895, p < 0.001, respectively). CLUE lobe score correlated negatively with partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in the human model (n = 20, r = -0.775, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
EVLW monitoring in donor lungs with CLUE after procurement is feasible and CLUE scores were found to be significantly correlated with lung weight, wet/dry, and PaO
Identifiants
pubmed: 31000373
pii: S1053-2498(19)31428-7
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.03.005
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
757-766Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.