No compromise between metabolism and behavior of decorator crabs in reduced pH conditions.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 04 2019
18 04 2019
Historique:
received:
31
10
2018
accepted:
02
04
2019
entrez:
20
4
2019
pubmed:
20
4
2019
medline:
11
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many marine calcifiers experience metabolic costs when exposed to experimental ocean acidification conditions, potentially limiting the energy available to support regulatory processes and behaviors. Decorator crabs expend energy on decoration camouflage and may face acute trade-offs under environmental stress. We hypothesized that under reduced pH conditions, decorator crabs will be energy limited and allocate energy towards growth and calcification at the expense of decoration behavior. Decorator crabs, Pelia tumida, were exposed to ambient (8.01) and reduced (7.74) pH conditions for five weeks. Half of the animals in each treatment were given sponge to decorate with. Animals were analyzed for changes in body mass, exoskeleton mineral content (Ca and Mg), organic content (a proxy for metabolism), and decoration behavior (sponge mass and percent cover). Overall, decorator crabs showed no signs of energy limitation under reduced pH conditions. Exoskeleton mineral content, body mass, and organic content of crabs remained the same across pH and decoration treatments, with no effect of reduced pH on decoration behavior. Despite being a relatively inactive, osmoconforming species, Pelia tumida is able to maintain multiple regulatory processes and behavior when exposed to environmental pH stress, which underscores the complexity of responses within Crustacea to ocean acidification conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31000765
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42696-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-42696-8
pmc: PMC6472338
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6262Références
Ecol Lett. 2010 Nov;13(11):1419-34
pubmed: 20958904
J Exp Biol. 2012 Jan 1;215(Pt 1):161-8
pubmed: 22162864
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 15;6:38637
pubmed: 27974830
J Exp Biol. 2013 Apr 15;216(Pt 8):1412-22
pubmed: 23536589
J Exp Biol. 2002 Apr;205(Pt 8):1153-60
pubmed: 11919274
BMC Genomics. 2014 Sep 12;15:789
pubmed: 25216596
J Exp Biol. 1976 Feb;64(1):149-57
pubmed: 1270987
J Exp Biol. 1996;199(Pt 8):1801-7
pubmed: 9319709
J Exp Biol. 1999 Dec;202 Pt 24:3587-95
pubmed: 10574735
PeerJ. 2017 Mar 22;5:e3122
pubmed: 28348933
Bioresour Technol. 2013 Dec;150:139-48
pubmed: 24161552
Respir Physiol. 1980 Dec;42(3):247-61
pubmed: 6784208
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Mar;20(3):765-77
pubmed: 24273082
J Exp Biol. 2014 Nov 15;217(Pt 22):3974-80
pubmed: 25392458
Chemosphere. 2006 Jan;62(4):681-7
pubmed: 15990149
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1490-2
pubmed: 18497259
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 04;8(4):e60959
pubmed: 23593357
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jun;19(6):1884-96
pubmed: 23505245
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 01;5:10608
pubmed: 26030212
J Exp Biol. 2013 Apr 15;216(Pt 8):1405-11
pubmed: 23536588
Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(3):519-28
pubmed: 18084779