Standalone Instrumented Posterior Approach Used as Universal Approach for Tuberculosis Spondylodiscitis.
Instrumented
posterior approach
standalone
tuberculosis
Journal
Journal of neurosciences in rural practice
ISSN: 0976-3147
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci Rural Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101533710
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
20
4
2019
pubmed:
20
4
2019
medline:
20
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical management of spinal tuberculosis (TB) has been classically the anterior, then combined, and of late increasingly by the posterior approach. The posterior approach has been successful in early disease. There has been a paradigm shift and inquisitive to explore this approach in the more advanced and even long-segment disease. Our study is a retrospective analysis by authors in variable disease pattern of TB Spine operated at an institute using a single posterior approach. A retrospective case study series in a tertiary level hospital. The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional and radiological results of an all posterior instrumented approach used as a "universal approach" in tubercular spondylodiscitis of variable presentation. The study is from January 2015 to May 2018. Twenty-four of 38 patients met the inclusion criterion with a male: female = 8:16, and mean age 44.26 years. The initial diagnosis of TB was based on clinic-radiologic basis. Their level of affection, number of vertebrae affected, and vertebral body collapse, the kyphosis (preoperative, predicted, postoperative, and final residual) and bony fusion were measured in the preoperative, postoperative, and final X rays. Functional scoring regarding visual analog scale and Frankel neurology grading was done at presentation and follow-up of patients. Histopathological data of all patients were collected and anti-tubercular therapy completed for a period of 1 year with 4 drugs (HRZE) for 2 months and 2 drugs (HR) for rest of period. The descriptive data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, and other parameters were calculated using the appropriate statistical tests such as the Student paired The mean number of vertebrae involved was 3.29 ± 0.86 (2-6) with mean vertebral body destruction was 0.616. Preoperatively, the mean kyphosis angle was 22.42° ± 12.56° and was corrected postoperatively to 13.08° ± 11.34° with an average correction of 9.34° (41.66%). At the latest follow-up, there was mean loss of correction of 0.80° resulting in 13.88° of final correction. Bony fusion was achieved in 20 patients (83.33%) cases. Neurological recovery occurred in all patients (100%), and 92% could be ambulatory at 1 year follow-up. There was improvement of visual analog scale from 6.33 ± 1.05 preoperatively to 1.042 ± 0.75 at 3 months of postoperative period. Two patients had bed sore, two had urinary infection, and one had neurological worsening requiring re exploration and cage removal eventually recovering to Frankel E. Two patients died due to unrelated cause. The procedure in safe and has satisfactory results in variable group affection of Pott's spine including early and late disease, multisegment involvement using pedicle screw fixation with/without cage support.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Surgical management of spinal tuberculosis (TB) has been classically the anterior, then combined, and of late increasingly by the posterior approach. The posterior approach has been successful in early disease. There has been a paradigm shift and inquisitive to explore this approach in the more advanced and even long-segment disease. Our study is a retrospective analysis by authors in variable disease pattern of TB Spine operated at an institute using a single posterior approach.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN
METHODS
A retrospective case study series in a tertiary level hospital.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional and radiological results of an all posterior instrumented approach used as a "universal approach" in tubercular spondylodiscitis of variable presentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
The study is from January 2015 to May 2018. Twenty-four of 38 patients met the inclusion criterion with a male: female = 8:16, and mean age 44.26 years. The initial diagnosis of TB was based on clinic-radiologic basis. Their level of affection, number of vertebrae affected, and vertebral body collapse, the kyphosis (preoperative, predicted, postoperative, and final residual) and bony fusion were measured in the preoperative, postoperative, and final X rays. Functional scoring regarding visual analog scale and Frankel neurology grading was done at presentation and follow-up of patients. Histopathological data of all patients were collected and anti-tubercular therapy completed for a period of 1 year with 4 drugs (HRZE) for 2 months and 2 drugs (HR) for rest of period.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED
METHODS
The descriptive data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, and other parameters were calculated using the appropriate statistical tests such as the Student paired
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean number of vertebrae involved was 3.29 ± 0.86 (2-6) with mean vertebral body destruction was 0.616. Preoperatively, the mean kyphosis angle was 22.42° ± 12.56° and was corrected postoperatively to 13.08° ± 11.34° with an average correction of 9.34° (41.66%). At the latest follow-up, there was mean loss of correction of 0.80° resulting in 13.88° of final correction. Bony fusion was achieved in 20 patients (83.33%) cases. Neurological recovery occurred in all patients (100%), and 92% could be ambulatory at 1 year follow-up. There was improvement of visual analog scale from 6.33 ± 1.05 preoperatively to 1.042 ± 0.75 at 3 months of postoperative period. Two patients had bed sore, two had urinary infection, and one had neurological worsening requiring re exploration and cage removal eventually recovering to Frankel E. Two patients died due to unrelated cause.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The procedure in safe and has satisfactory results in variable group affection of Pott's spine including early and late disease, multisegment involvement using pedicle screw fixation with/without cage support.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31001009
doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_294_18
pii: JNRP-10-225
pmc: PMC6454971
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
225-233Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Neurosurg. 1999 Oct;91(2 Suppl):163-9
pubmed: 10505499
Eur Spine J. 2001 Dec;10(6):540-4
pubmed: 11806397
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 May;(398):75-84
pubmed: 11964634
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Jan;85(1):100-6
pubmed: 12585586
Br J Surg. 1962 Jul;50:26-38
pubmed: 14458264
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Oct;120(4):316-53
pubmed: 15520485
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 1;29(17):E363-7
pubmed: 15534398
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 1;30(13):E352-62
pubmed: 15990652
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD004532
pubmed: 16437489
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Dec;19(8):554-9
pubmed: 17146297
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Dec;19(8):595-602
pubmed: 17146304
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Feb;20(1):78-81
pubmed: 17285057
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18(8):1096-101
pubmed: 19357878
Eur Spine J. 2010 Dec;19(12):2209-15
pubmed: 20589519
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jul;92(7):905-13
pubmed: 20595106
Int Orthop. 2012 Feb;36(2):373-80
pubmed: 22038489
Int Orthop. 2012 Feb;36(2):299-305
pubmed: 22042304
Int Orthop. 2012 Feb;36(2):359-65
pubmed: 22234705
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Oct;25(7):E217-23
pubmed: 22854920
Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22(3):624-32
pubmed: 23053761
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1855-67
pubmed: 24474323
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Jun;9(6):2269-2274
pubmed: 26136972
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):18611-9
pubmed: 26770474
Asian Spine J. 2017 Feb;11(1):31-36
pubmed: 28243366
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Apr;69(4):503-9
pubmed: 3571308
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 1;19(9):1039-43
pubmed: 8029738
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Oct 1;18(13):1890-4
pubmed: 8235878
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jun;78(6):839-47
pubmed: 8666601
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 May;80(3):456-62
pubmed: 9619936