Architecture and Florogenesis in Female
branching
cannabis
inflorescence
photoperiod
solitary flower
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
08
01
2019
accepted:
07
03
2019
entrez:
20
4
2019
pubmed:
20
4
2019
medline:
20
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The inflorescence is the main product of medical cannabis. Hundreds of specialized metabolites with potential bioactivity are produced and accumulated in the glandular trichomes that are highly abundant mainly on female inflorescences. Understanding the morphophysiological and genetic mechanisms governing flower and inflorescence development is therefore of high scientific and practical importance. However, in-depth investigations of cannabis florogenesis are limited. Cannabis producers and researchers consider long photoperiod to be "non-inductive" or "vegetative," but under these growth conditions, the development of solitary flowers and bracts in shoot internodes clearly indicates that the plant cannot be defined as vegetative or non-inductive in the classical sense. Most probably, induction of solitary flowers is age-dependent and controlled by internal signals, but not by photoperiod. Short photoperiod induces intense branching, which results in the development of a compound raceme. Each inflorescence consists of condensed branchlets with the same phytomer structure as that of the larger phytomers developed under long day. Each phytomer consists of reduced leaves, bracts, one or two solitary flowers, and an axillary shoot (or inflorescence). Therefore, the effect of short photoperiod on cannabis florogenesis is not flower induction, but rather a dramatic change in shoot apex architecture to form a compound racemose inflorescence structure. An understanding of the morphophysiological characteristics of cannabis inflorescence will lay the foundation for biotechnological and physiological applications to modify architecture and to maximize plant productivity and uniformity in medical
Identifiants
pubmed: 31001293
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00350
pmc: PMC6454139
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
350Références
Ann Bot. 2007 Sep;100(3):659-76
pubmed: 17679690
Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Jun;14(6):302-9
pubmed: 19423382
J Exp Bot. 2010 May;61(9):2235-46
pubmed: 20308206
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Dec;33(12):2065-83
pubmed: 20626645
Am J Bot. 2004 Jun;91(6):966-75
pubmed: 21653452
Plant Cell Physiol. 2013 Mar;54(3):352-68
pubmed: 23220822
Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(8):1523-42
pubmed: 23445936
Plant Cell. 2013 Apr;25(4):1228-42
pubmed: 23613197
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014 Feb;17:70-7
pubmed: 24507497
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Sep 16;5:465
pubmed: 25278944
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015 Apr;32:121-129
pubmed: 25553537
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 09;6:233
pubmed: 25914710
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Feb 04;7:19
pubmed: 26870049
Plant J. 2017 May;90(4):708-719
pubmed: 27995671
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Nov;84(11):2463-2467
pubmed: 29701252
New Phytol. 2019 Feb;221(3):1328-1344
pubmed: 30238569
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018 Oct 01;3(1):203-212
pubmed: 30426073
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Dec 21;9:1876
pubmed: 30627133