Regulation of the apical extension morphogenesis tunes the mechanosensory response of microvilliated neurons.
Actins
/ metabolism
Animals
Cell Differentiation
Cell Surface Extensions
/ physiology
Cerebrospinal Fluid
/ physiology
Mechanotransduction, Cellular
/ physiology
Microvilli
/ physiology
Morphogenesis
/ physiology
Neurons
/ physiology
Sensory Receptor Cells
/ physiology
Spinal Cord
/ metabolism
Zebrafish
/ metabolism
Journal
PLoS biology
ISSN: 1545-7885
Titre abrégé: PLoS Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101183755
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
09
08
2018
accepted:
03
04
2019
revised:
01
05
2019
pubmed:
20
4
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
entrez:
20
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Multiple types of microvilliated sensory cells exhibit an apical extension thought to be instrumental in the detection of sensory cues. The investigation of the mechanisms underlying morphogenesis of sensory apparatus is critical to understand the biology of sensation. Most of what we currently know comes from the study of the hair bundle of the inner ear sensory cells, but morphogenesis and function of other sensory microvilliated apical extensions remain poorly understood. We focused on spinal sensory neurons that contact the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the projection of a microvilliated apical process in the central canal, referred to as cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons (CSF-cNs). CSF-cNs respond to pH and osmolarity changes as well as mechanical stimuli associated with changes of flow and tail bending. In vivo time-lapse imaging in zebrafish embryos revealed that CSF-cNs are atypical neurons that do not lose their apical attachment and form a ring of actin at the apical junctional complexes (AJCs) that they retain during differentiation. We show that the actin-based protrusions constituting the microvilliated apical extension arise and elongate from this ring of actin, and we identify candidate molecular factors underlying every step of CSF-cN morphogenesis. We demonstrate that Crumbs 1 (Crb1), Myosin 3b (Myo3b), and Espin orchestrate the morphogenesis of CSF-cN apical extension. Using calcium imaging in crb1 and espin mutants, we further show that the size of the apical extension modulates the amplitude of CSF-cN sensory response to bending of the spinal cord. Based on our results, we propose that the apical actin ring could be a common site of initiation of actin-based protrusions in microvilliated sensory cells. Furthermore, our work provides a set of actors underlying actin-based protrusion elongation shared by different sensory cell types and highlights the critical role of the apical extension shape in sensory detection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31002663
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000235
pii: PBIOLOGY-D-18-00421
pmc: PMC6493769
doi:
Substances chimiques
Actins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e3000235Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Cell Tissue Res. 1983;231(3):615-21
pubmed: 6871973
Trends Cell Biol. 2008 Feb;18(2):52-60
pubmed: 18215522
J Biol Chem. 1998 Nov 6;273(45):29745-53
pubmed: 9792688
Nature. 2013 Nov 14;503(7475):285-9
pubmed: 24067609
EMBO Rep. 2014 Apr;15(4):351-64
pubmed: 24639559
Int J Dev Biol. 2007;51(6-7):597-608
pubmed: 17891720
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000 Feb;12(1):72-8
pubmed: 10679353
Curr Biol. 2015 Dec 7;25(23):3035-47
pubmed: 26752076
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(6):e1002762
pubmed: 22685423
BMC Genomics. 2015 Oct 23;16:842
pubmed: 26494580
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006 Oct;63(19-20):2329-41
pubmed: 16909209
Curr Biol. 2012 Feb 21;22(4):320-5
pubmed: 22264607
Genome Biol. 2016 Jul 05;17(1):148
pubmed: 27380939
Development. 2014 Mar;141(6):1282-91
pubmed: 24595289
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006 Feb;18(1):18-25
pubmed: 16337369
Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):200-4
pubmed: 24408437
J Neurosci. 2004 Jun 9;24(23):5445-56
pubmed: 15190118
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018 Jan 2;10(1):
pubmed: 28264821
J Cell Biol. 2000 Jan 10;148(1):1-6
pubmed: 10629213
Cell. 2018 Aug 9;174(4):999-1014.e22
pubmed: 30096314
Nature. 2002 Mar 14;416(6877):143-9
pubmed: 11850625
Int J Dev Neurosci. 2013 Dec;31(8):770-82
pubmed: 24071007
Int Rev Cytol. 1973;35:189-251
pubmed: 4584250
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 07;7:10866
pubmed: 26946992
Dev Cell. 2016 Jun 20;37(6):493-506
pubmed: 27326928
J Cell Biol. 2016 Jan 18;212(2):231-44
pubmed: 26754646
Dev Cell. 2012 Jun 12;22(6):1261-74
pubmed: 22579223
J Cell Sci. 1996 Jun;109 ( Pt 6):1229-39
pubmed: 8799813
Nat Methods. 2007 Apr;4(4):323-6
pubmed: 17369834
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
J Cell Biol. 2003 Dec 8;163(5):1045-55
pubmed: 14657236
J Cell Biol. 2014 Nov 24;207(4):441-51
pubmed: 25422372
Nature. 2006 Aug 24;442(7105):934-8
pubmed: 16929298
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 05;5:16273
pubmed: 26537835
Dev Dyn. 1995 Jul;203(3):253-310
pubmed: 8589427
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 7;7(1):719
pubmed: 28389647
Development. 2004 Dec;131(23):5959-69
pubmed: 15539490
Front Neuroanat. 2014 May 06;8:26
pubmed: 24834029
Development. 2016 Mar 1;143(5):880-91
pubmed: 26839365
Pflugers Arch. 2015 Jan;467(1):49-72
pubmed: 24957570
Hear Res. 1984 Aug;15(2):103-12
pubmed: 6436216
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):703-10
pubmed: 19471269
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 08;7:10002
pubmed: 26743691
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 04;9(2):e87748
pubmed: 24504595
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1987 Nov 23;232(1267):193-203
pubmed: 2892204
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 18;9(1):3804
pubmed: 30228263
Dev Cell. 2012 Aug 14;23(2):329-41
pubmed: 22898777
J Cell Biol. 1998 Oct 5;143(1):121-33
pubmed: 9763425
Elife. 2015 Jun 15;4:
pubmed: 26076409
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 1;7(1):16778
pubmed: 29196707
Curr Biol. 2016 Nov 7;26(21):2841-2853
pubmed: 27720623
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015 Oct;34:172-9
pubmed: 26342686
Curr Biol. 2013 Apr 8;23(7):R289-93
pubmed: 23578880
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Jun;13(6):673-9
pubmed: 20453852
J Neurogenet. 2017 Sep;31(3):113-127
pubmed: 28789587
J Physiol. 2012 Aug 15;590(16):3719-41
pubmed: 22570378
J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;23(4):1310-9
pubmed: 12598619
J Cell Biol. 1998 Oct 5;143(1):107-19
pubmed: 9763424
J Med Genet. 2006 Feb;43(2):157-61
pubmed: 15930085
Nature. 1989 Oct 5;341(6241):397-404
pubmed: 2677742
Cell. 2000 Aug 4;102(3):377-85
pubmed: 10975527
Nat Methods. 2008 Jul;5(7):605-7
pubmed: 18536722
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 01;7:10833
pubmed: 26926603
Eur J Cell Biol. 2011 Nov;90(11):926-33
pubmed: 20965607
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Aug;5(8):635-46
pubmed: 15366707
Development. 2010 Aug;137(16):2713-22
pubmed: 20610488
Mol Biol Cell. 2015 Aug 1;26(15):2727-32
pubmed: 26229154
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010 Jun;21(4):350-6
pubmed: 19913105
PLoS Genet. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1002032
pubmed: 21455486
Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Mar 04;9:62
pubmed: 25852469
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011 Feb;23(1):14-21
pubmed: 21093245