Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
02
10
2018
accepted:
02
04
2019
entrez:
20
4
2019
pubmed:
20
4
2019
medline:
14
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have improved the ability to estimate densities of rare and elusive animals. However, SCR models have seldom been validated even as model formulations diversify and expand to incorporate new sampling methods and/or additional sources of information on model parameters. Information on the relationship between encounter probabilities, sources of additional information, and the reliability of density estimates, is rare but crucial to assessing reliability of SCR-based estimates. We used a simulation-based approach that incorporated prior empirical work to assess the accuracy and precision of density estimates from SCR models using spatially unstructured sampling. To assess the consequences of sparse data and potential sources of bias, we simulated data under six scenarios corresponding to three different levels of search effort and two levels of correlation between search effort and animal density. We then estimated density for each scenario using four models that included increasing amounts of information from harvested individuals and telemetry to evaluate the impact of additional sources of information. Model results were sensitive to the quantity of available information: density estimates based on low search effort were biased high and imprecise, whereas estimates based on high search effort were unbiased and precise. A correlation between search effort and animal density resulted in a positive bias in density estimates, though the bias decreased with increasingly informative datasets. Adding information from harvested individuals and telemetered individuals improved density estimates based on low and moderate effort but had negligible impact for datasets resulting from high effort. We demonstrated that density estimates from SCR models using spatially unstructured sampling are reliable when sufficient information is provided. Accurate density estimates can result if empirical-based simulations such as those presented here are used to develop study designs with appropriate amounts of effort and information sources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31002709
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215458
pii: PONE-D-18-28726
pmc: PMC6474654
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.vv7s70m']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0215458Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2281-9
pubmed: 18724738
Ecol Appl. 2016 Jun;26(4):1125-35
pubmed: 27509753
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 1;8(1):2177
pubmed: 29391588
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 Sep;15(5):1133-44
pubmed: 25693632
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34575
pubmed: 22539949
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 05;9(2):e88025
pubmed: 24505361
J Am Stat Assoc. 2015 Jan 2;110(509):195-204
pubmed: 26063947
Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):695-705
pubmed: 26214915
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 25;7(1):9446
pubmed: 28842589
Am J Primatol. 2017 Jul;79(7):
pubmed: 28267880
Biometrics. 2003 Jun;59(2):351-64
pubmed: 12926720
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185588
pubmed: 28973034
Conserv Biol. 2011 Apr;25(2):356-64
pubmed: 21166714
Biometrics. 2005 Sep;61(3):868-73; discussion 874-6
pubmed: 16135042
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Mar;85(2):487-96
pubmed: 26395576
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 03;10(9):e0136525
pubmed: 26334997