Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 08 2019
Historique:
received: 19 02 2019
revised: 04 04 2019
accepted: 08 04 2019
pubmed: 20 4 2019
medline: 4 1 2020
entrez: 20 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost plus external beam radiation therapy is an established option for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) boost can potentially mimic high-dose-rate boost and could be a viable alternative. Here we report the long-term outcomes of a phase 1 dose-escalation trial of single-fraction SBRT boost. Patients had intermediate-risk PCa and were accrued to 3 different SBRT single-fraction dose-level cohorts (10 Gy, 12.5 Gy, and 15 Gy). All received supplemental radiation therapy afterwards (37.5 Gy in 15 fractions). Three gold fiducials were implanted for image guidance. Patients were simulated and treated with a foley catheter and intrarectal balloon. A T2 magnetic resonance imaging scan was used for contouring, and a cine magnetic resonance imaging scan was used to calculate patient-specific internal target volume margins. Toxicity and quality-of-life data were collected using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. 30 patients were accrued, 10 in each cohort. Median follow-up was 72 months. 60% had unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa. Two patients in the 15 Gy cohort developed late grade ≥3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity, with 1 patient suffering from a grade-4 rectal fistula after a rectal ulcer was biopsied repeatedly. Two patients had biochemical failure. Median PSA nadir was 0.4 ng/mL with 10 Gy, 0.09 ng/mL with 12.5 Gy and 0.07 ng/mL with 15 Gy. Median PSA at 4 years as well as proportion achieving a nadir <0.2 ng/mL improved significantly with higher doses. There was no significant change in quality of life from baseline in any of the domains, and the minimal clinically important change was not statistically different between the 3 cohorts. Other than a grade 4 toxicity, which may in part be due to repeated biopsies of a rectal ulcer, single-fraction SBRT boost was feasible and well tolerated. Larger studies are warranted to better document the outcomes of such an approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31002941
pii: S0360-3016(19)30624-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.04.006
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

KLK3 protein, human EC 3.4.21.-
Kallikreins EC 3.4.21.-
Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase I Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1066-1073

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Yasir Alayed (Y)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Andrew Loblaw (A)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Health Policy, Measurement, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

William Chu (W)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Motasem Al-Hanaqta (M)

Queen Alia Oncology Center, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.

Andrew Chiang (A)

Carlo Fidani Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, Canada.

Suneil Jain (S)

Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Hans Chung (H)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Danny Vesprini (D)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Gerard Morton (G)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Ananth Ravi (A)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Melanie Davidson (M)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Andrea Deabreu (A)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Alexandre Mamedov (A)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Liying Zhang (L)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Darby Erler (D)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Patrick Cheung (P)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: patrick.cheung@sunnybrook.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH