Trends of antenatal care during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the global network maternal and newborn health registry.
Antenatal care
Low-middle income countries
Maternal health
Journal
Seminars in perinatology
ISSN: 1558-075X
Titre abrégé: Semin Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7801132
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
22
4
2019
medline:
23
5
2020
entrez:
22
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Antenatal care (ANC) is an important opportunity to diagnose and treat pregnancy-related complications and to deliver interventions aimed at improving health and survival of both mother and the infant. Multiple individual studies and national surveys have assessed antenatal care utilization at a single point in time across different countries, but ANC trends have not often been studied in rural areas of low-middle income countries (LMICs). The objective of this analysis was to study the trends of antenatal care use in LMICs over a seven-year period. Using a prospective maternal and newborn health registry study, we analyzed data collected from 2011 to 2017 across five countries (Guatemala, India [2 sites], Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia). Utilization of any ANC along with use of select services, including vitamins/iron, tetanus toxoid vaccine and HIV testing, were assessed. We used a generalized linear regression model to examine the trends of women receiving at least one and at least four antenatal care visits by site and year, controlling for maternal age, education and parity. Between January 2011 and December 2017, 313,663 women were enrolled and included in the analysis. For all six sites, a high proportion of women received at least one ANC visit across this period. Over the years, there was a trend for an increasing proportion of women receiving at least one and at least four ANC visits in all sites, except for Guatemala where a decline in ANC was observed. Regarding utilization of specific services, in India almost 100% of women reported receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine, vitamins/iron supplementation and HIV testing services for all study years. In Kenya, a small increase in the proportion of women receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine was observed, while for Zambia, tetanus toxoid use declined from 97% in 2011 to 89% in 2017. No trends for tetanus toxoid use were observed for Pakistan and Guatemala. Across all countries an increasing trend was observed for use of vitamins/iron and HIV testing. However, HIV testing remained very low (<0.1%) for Pakistan. In a range of LMICs, from 2011 to 2017 nearly all women received at least one ANC visit, and a significant increase in the proportion of women who received at least four ANC visits was observed across all sites except Guatemala. Moreover, there were variations regarding the utilization of preventive care services across all sites except for India where rates were generally high. More research is required to understand the quality and influences of ANC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Antenatal care (ANC) is an important opportunity to diagnose and treat pregnancy-related complications and to deliver interventions aimed at improving health and survival of both mother and the infant. Multiple individual studies and national surveys have assessed antenatal care utilization at a single point in time across different countries, but ANC trends have not often been studied in rural areas of low-middle income countries (LMICs). The objective of this analysis was to study the trends of antenatal care use in LMICs over a seven-year period.
METHODS
Using a prospective maternal and newborn health registry study, we analyzed data collected from 2011 to 2017 across five countries (Guatemala, India [2 sites], Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia). Utilization of any ANC along with use of select services, including vitamins/iron, tetanus toxoid vaccine and HIV testing, were assessed. We used a generalized linear regression model to examine the trends of women receiving at least one and at least four antenatal care visits by site and year, controlling for maternal age, education and parity.
RESULTS
Between January 2011 and December 2017, 313,663 women were enrolled and included in the analysis. For all six sites, a high proportion of women received at least one ANC visit across this period. Over the years, there was a trend for an increasing proportion of women receiving at least one and at least four ANC visits in all sites, except for Guatemala where a decline in ANC was observed. Regarding utilization of specific services, in India almost 100% of women reported receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine, vitamins/iron supplementation and HIV testing services for all study years. In Kenya, a small increase in the proportion of women receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine was observed, while for Zambia, tetanus toxoid use declined from 97% in 2011 to 89% in 2017. No trends for tetanus toxoid use were observed for Pakistan and Guatemala. Across all countries an increasing trend was observed for use of vitamins/iron and HIV testing. However, HIV testing remained very low (<0.1%) for Pakistan.
CONCLUSION
In a range of LMICs, from 2011 to 2017 nearly all women received at least one ANC visit, and a significant increase in the proportion of women who received at least four ANC visits was observed across all sites except Guatemala. Moreover, there were variations regarding the utilization of preventive care services across all sites except for India where rates were generally high. More research is required to understand the quality and influences of ANC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31005357
pii: S0146-0005(19)30045-X
doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.020
pmc: PMC7027164
mid: NIHMS1553670
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
297-307Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD078438
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076457
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076474
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD078439
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Feb;4(2):e98-e108
pubmed: 26795602
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Mar 03;14:94
pubmed: 24589139
Lancet. 2009 Nov 28;374(9704):1831-9
pubmed: 19944864
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Mar 20;14:111
pubmed: 24650219
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53747
pubmed: 23335973
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Oct;5(10):e977-e983
pubmed: 28911763
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Feb;30(1):78-87
pubmed: 24357197
Afr J Health Sci. 2004;11(1-2):21-32
pubmed: 17298114
Lancet. 2015 Jan 31;385(9966):466-76
pubmed: 24990815
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Jun;86(6):452-9
pubmed: 18568274
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Sep;118(3):190-3
pubmed: 22738806
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010404
pubmed: 27231540
Reprod Health. 2015;12 Suppl 2:S1
pubmed: 26063166